Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151469›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2021

Resistance Sources and Antixenotic Factors in Brazilian Bean Genotypes Against Bemisia tabaci.

T L B Santos, E L L Baldin, L P Ribeiro, C M Souza, M C E Soares, T L M Fanela, A L Lourenção

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T L B SantosDept of Crop Protection, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State Univ (FCA/UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brasil. thais_lohaine@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8851-5647
E L L BaldinDept of Crop Protection, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State Univ (FCA/UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brasil.
L P RibeiroResearch Center for Family Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Company of Santa Catarina (CEPAF/EPAGRI), Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
C M SouzaDept of Crop Protection, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State Univ (FCA/UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brasil.
M C E SoaresDept of Crop Protection, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State Univ (FCA/UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brasil.
T L M FanelaDept of Crop Protection, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State Univ (FCA/UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brasil.
A L LourençãoDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo State, Brasil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BREmpresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Middle East Asia Minor 1 is one of the most important pests of the common bean, due to its potential of causing direct and indirect damage. This study aimed to evaluate 78 bean genotypes to verify the occurrence of resistance of antixenosis type against B. tabaci. Initially, multiple-choice trials were performed to evaluate the oviposition preference and nymphs' establishment at 3 and 15 days after infestation. Subsequently, 21 bean genotypes were selected, and a no-choice test was conducted. Colorimetric analyses were performed to establish correlations between leaf color and insect establishment. In multiple-choice trial, the genotypes BRS Ametista, BRS Estilo, BRS Esplendor, SCS 204 Predileto, BRS Notável, IPR Eldorado, CHIB 06, IPR Quero-Quero, Iapar 81, CHIP 338, IPR Garça, Arcelina 4, SCS 202 Guará, IAC Esperança, H96102-1-1-1-52, CHIP 348, Carioca Comum, CHIP 300, IAC Carioca Eté, IAC Ybaté, and Tybatã were the least used for oviposition and nymph establishment, demonstrating antixenosis or antibiosis. In the no-choice trial, most genotypes were less attractive to whitefly, and the genotypes CHIB 06, IPR Garça, CHIP 300, and IAC Esperança had less oviposition. The most attractive genotypes presented high luminosity and more intense green and yellow colors, indicating positive correlation. Therefore, the genotypes BRS Ametista, SCS 204 Predileto, BRS Estilo, IPR Eldorado, SCS-202 Guará, Carioca Comum, Arcelina 4, CHIP 348, and IAC Esperança showed the highest resistance stability in the no-choice trial, and they are promising sources of antixenotic factors for use in breeding programs to obtain whitefly-resistant common bean lines.

Indexed as

HemipteraHerbivoryAnimalsBrazilColorFemaleGenotypeNymphOvipositionPhaseolusPlant LeavesTrichomesantixenosiscolorimetryhost selectionPhaseolus vulgaris L.trichomesWhitefly

Identifiers

PMID33151469
OpenAlexW3097048208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.