ArticleBiotechnology letters2021
Improvement of glutathione production by a metabolically engineered Yarrowia lipolytica strain using a small-scale optimization approach.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systems metabolic engineering of glutathione biosynthesis inEngineering microbiology · 2025Article
- Influence of process parameters on single-cell oil production by Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus using response surface methodology.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2025Article
- Glutathione production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current state and perspectives.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to maximize glutathione (GSH) production by a metabolically engineered Yarrowia lipolytica strain using a small-scale optimization approach.
resultsA three levels four factorial Box-Behnken Design was used to assess the effect of pH, inulin extract, yeast extract and ammonium sulfate concentrations on cell growth and to generate a mathematical model which predict optimal conditions to maximize biomass production and thus GSH titer. The obtained results revealed that only yeast and inulin extract concentrations significantly affect biomass production. Based on the generated model, a medium composed of 10 g/L of yeast extract and 10 g/L of inulin extract from Jerusalem artichoke was used to conduct batch cultures in 2 L bioreactor. After 48 h of culture, the biomass and the glutathione titer increased by 55% (5.8 g
conclusionFrom the obtained results, it could be observed that the model established from small scale culture (i.e. 2 mL) is able to predict performance at larger scale (i.e. 2 L bioreactor, two orders of magnitude scale-up). Moreover, the results highlight the ability of the optimized process to ensure high titer of glutathione using a low-cost carbon source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33151450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.