ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
Contribution of chemotherapy to improved prognosis in stage 4 gastric cancer: trend analysis of a regional population-based cancer registry in Japan.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone and soft tissue sarcoma mortality in 19 811 patients diagnosed in Japan, 2006-2020.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Conversion surgery of stage 4 gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination after overcoming immune-related liver injury: a case report and literature review.International cancer conference journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of proximal and distal gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on SEER database.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic Impact of Perioperative CA125 Status in Gastric Cancer Based on New Cutoff Values.Cureus · 2024Article
- Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer in Japan: A real-world analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical significance of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Predictors of survival outcomes among patients with gastric cancer in a leading tertiary, teaching and referral hospital in Kenya.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Volume-Outcome Relationship in Cancer Survival Rates: Analysis of a Regional Population-Based Cancer Registry in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Retrospective comparison of flot and modified dcf as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018.The oncologist · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLittle is known about time trends in the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC), since the introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents. This study aimed to analyze how the increased number of available chemotherapeutic options affected the prognosis of GC and which patient types benefited within in a large population.
methodsFrom a population-based cancer registry in Japan, 35,751 cases of GC were identified. Of these, 8214 cases were stage 4. The time trend for 3-year survival in stage 4 GC according to patient characteristics (age and tumor location) was estimated in relation to the introduction of new anticancer drugs. Multiple imputation was performed for sensitivity analysis to strengthen the missing data. In addition, we estimated the 5-year survival rate for distal-GC (DGC) and proximal-GC (PGC), and the hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by Cox proportional hazard model.
resultsImprovement of overall survival was accelerated in stage 4 cases over time. The prognosis was improved from 11.4% to 13.2%, subsequent to the approval of several oncologic drugs since 2009. Younger patients were more likely to have improved survival rates in response to the increase in chemotherapy options (< 60-year-old, 5.4%: 60-70, 2.2%; 70-80, 0.3%) from 2007 to 2015. The HR for DGC vs. PGC was 1.11 (95% CI 1.08-1.15), and PGC showed a higher rate of improved outcomes (2.4% vs. 0.6%).
conclusionsThis analysis showed that improvement in the GC survival rate was accelerated by the introduction of new chemotherapeutic strategies and it was most evident among younger patients and in patients with PGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.