ReviewMikrochimica acta2020
Nanobiosensors as new diagnostic tools for SARS, MERS and COVID-19: from past to perspectives.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the advancement on colorimetric nanobiosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2023Pooled it
- Low-Cost, Disposable Biosensor for Detection of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Biomarker in Noninvasively Collected Saliva toward Diagnosis of Mental Disorders.ACS polymers Au · 2025Article
- Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for the Detection of COVID-19.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Microfluidics-Based Nanobiosensors for Healthcare Monitoring.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Lateral flow assay: a promising rapid point-of-care testing tool for infections and non-communicable diseases.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2023Review
- A lightweight CORONA-NET for COVID-19 detection in X-ray images.Expert systems with applications · 2023Article
- Carbon-based biosensors: Next-generation diagnostic tool for target-specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).Talanta open · 2023Article
- Recent trends in carbon nanotube (CNT)-based biosensors for the fast and sensitive detection of human viruses: a critical review.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Recent Developments in Nanotechnology-Based Biosensors for the Diagnosis of Coronavirus.Plasmonics (Norwell, Mass.) · 2023Review
- COVID-19 diagnostics: Molecular biology to nanomaterials.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2023Review
- Advances in Biosensing Technologies for Diagnosis of COVID-19.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Influencing Factors on Airflow and Pollutant Dispersion around Buildings under the Combined Effect of Wind and Buoyancy-A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Electrochemical biosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Voltametric or impedimetric transduction?Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Review
- Design and finite element modeling of two-dimensional nanomechanical biosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection.Diamond and related materials · 2022Article
- A Comparative Study of Voltammetric vs Impedimetric Immunosensor for Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Detection at the Point-of-care.Electroanalysis · 2022Article
- An Optical Modeling Framework for Coronavirus Detection Using Graphene-Based Nanosensor.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Forecasting the Post-Pandemic Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Using the Bullwhip Phenomenon Alongside Use of Nanosensors for Disease Containment and Cure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Zinc associated nanomaterials and their intervention in emerging respiratory viruses: Journey to the field of biomedicine and biomaterials.Coordination chemistry reviews · 2022Review
- Electrochemical nanobiosensors equipped with peptides: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and novel coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) epidemics represent the biggest global health threats in the last two decades. These infections manifest as bronchitis, pneumonia or severe, sometimes fatal, respiratory illness. The novel coronavirus seems to be associated with milder infections but it has spread globally more rapidly becoming a pandemic. This review summarises the state of the art of nanotechnology-based affinity biosensors for SARS, MERS and COVID-19 detection. The nanobiosensors are antibody- or DNA-based biosensors with electrochemical, optical or FET-based transduction. Various kinds of nanomaterials, such as metal nanoparticles, nanowires and graphene, have been merged to the affinity biosensors to enhance their analytical performances. The advantages of the use of the nanomaterials are highlighted, and the results compared with those obtained using non-nanostructured biosensors. A critical comparison with conventional methods, such as RT-PCR and ELISA, is also reported. It is hoped that this review will provide interesting information for the future development of new reliable nano-based platforms for point-of-care diagnostic devices for COVID-19 prevention and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.