ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Larger bore percutaneous catheter in necrotic pancreatic fluid collection is associated with better outcomes.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of early pancreatic necrotic collection: Single-center retrospective study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Application and Value of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Contemporary Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Necrosis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis-Advances and Challenges in Management for Optimal Clinical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024Review
- When to Intervene in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review of the Optimal Timing for Intervention Strategies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Impact of the Timing of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage following Endoscopic Drainage on Outcomes in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024Article
- Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Early vs. late percutaneous catheter drainage of acute necrotic collections in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis: An update.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.DEN open · 2023Review
- Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Consensus Guidelines on Interventions in Pancreatitis.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2022Review
- Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis: A comprehensive overview.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Triple guidance of choledochoscopy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography facilitates percutaneous catheter drainage of infected walled-off necrosis.Insights into imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of initial catheter size on the clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis (AP).
methodsThis retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with AP who underwent percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) between January 2018 and May 2019. Three hundred fifteen consecutive patients underwent PCD during the study period. Based on the initial catheter size, patients were divided into group I (≤ 12 F) and group II (> 12 F). The differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups, as well as multiple subgroups (based on the severity, timing of drainage, and presence of organ failure (OF)), were evaluated.
resultsOne hundred forty-six patients (mean age, 41.2 years, 114 males) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ninety-nine (67.8%) patients had severe AP based on revised Atlanta classification. The mean pain to PCD was 22 days (range, 3-267 days). Mean length of hospitalization (LOH) was 27.9 ± 15.8 days. Necrosectomy was performed in 20.5% of patients, and mortality was 16.4%. Group I and II comprised 74 and 72 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, except for a greater number of patients with OF in group II (p = 0.048). The intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter, and multiple readmissions were less frequent in group II (p = 0.037 and 0.013, respectively). Patients with severe AP and moderately severe AP in group II had significantly reduced rates of readmissions (p = 0.035) and significantly shorter LOH (p = 0.041), respectively.
conclusionLarge-sized catheters were associated with better clinical outcomes regardless of disease severity and other baseline disease characteristics. KEY POINTS: • Larger catheter size for initial PCD was associated with better clinical outcomes in AP. • The benefits were independent of the severity of AP, timing of PCD (ANC vs. WON) and presence of organ failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.