ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021
Head and neck adult-type soft tissues sarcomas: survival analysis and comparison between the last two editions of the TNM staging system.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Novel Location-Grading-Node-Metastasis Staging System in Patients With Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHead and neck soft tissues sarcomas (HNSTS) are a heterogeneous group of rare tumours. The 8th edition of the TNM staging system (8TNM) considered these lesions separately for the first time. The aim of this study is to assess its effectiveness and identify the most significant prognostic factors for HNSTS.
methodsA retrospective survival analysis on 101 HNSTS operated between 1995 and 2015 at the National Cancer Institute of Milan was carried out. The variables considered were pathological stage (according to both the 7TNM and 8TNM), site, histotype, depth, grading, surgical radicality, (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
resultsAccording to the 7TNM, the T category distribution was 35 T1a, 23 T1b, 11 T2a, and 32 T2b. Applying the 8TNM, the distribution changed to 19 T1, 18 T2, 35 T3, and 29 T4. Five-year overall and disease-specific survivals were 74.3 and 76.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated an increased hazard ratio (HR) for deep lesions invading adjacent structures, high-grade, surgery with close/microscopically positive margins, and chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis confirmed an increased HR for deep location and size > 5 cm, G2-G3 tumours, and marginal surgery. No significant difference was found among T categories of the 8TNM.
conclusionThe present study underlines the negative prognostic impact of depth, size > 5 cm, high grade, and marginal treatment for HNSTS. Our results did not allow to validate the 8TNM staging system since, apparently, it was not associated with meaningful prognostic stratification. Further studies with wider multicentric cohorts should, however, be performed to obtain more powerful statistical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.