Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151343›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging : Trends and developments].

A Mayr, G Reiter, D Beitzke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Cardiovascular consequences of smoking : Imaging overview].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A MayrUniversitätsklinik für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich.
G ReiterResearch and Development, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics GmbH, Straßgangerstraße 315, 8054, Graz, Österreich.
D BeitzkeUniversitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. dietrich.beitzke@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn its almost 25 years of clinical use, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been developed for a wide range of indications due to the development of robust techniques and their comprehensive validation. CMR-based assessment of cardiac volumes and systolic ventricular function as well as the characterization of focal myocardial scars belongs today to standard cardiac imaging. More recently, the introduction of accelerated acquisition techniques, quantitative myocardial T1- and T2-mapping methods and 4‑dimensional (4D) flow measurements as well as new postprocessing techniques such as myocardial feature tracking have attracted attention.

methodsThis review is based on a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database on new CMR techniques and their clinical application. RESULTS AND

conclusionThis article provides an overview of the latest technical developments in the field of CMR and their possible applications based on the most important clinical MR issues.

Indexed as

HeartMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardiumHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePredictive Value of Tests4‑D flow measurementsCompressed sensingMyocardial storage diseasesMyocarditisT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID33151343
PMCPMC7643723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.