Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151318›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Evaluation of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in New York City Public Housing After Implementation of the 2018 Federal Smoke-Free Housing Policy.

Lorna E Thorpe, Elle Anastasiou, Katarzyna Wyka, Albert Tovar, Emily Gill, Ana Rule, Brian Elbel, Sue A Kaplan, Nan Jiang, Terry Gordon and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Air Quality Risks in Public Housing.JAMA health forum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Resident Support for the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Rule in Public Housing: 2018-2022.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lorna E ThorpeDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Elle AnastasiouDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Katarzyna WykaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York.
Albert TovarDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Emily GillDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Ana RuleDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Brian ElbelDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Sue A KaplanDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Nan JiangDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Terry GordonDepartment of Environmental Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Donna ShelleyDepartment of Public Health Policy and Management, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York.
New York University · USCity University of New York · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

NYU-CUNY Prevention Research CenterU48DP006396 · DP · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUANG, TERRY T-K, THORPE, LORNA · 2018 to 2023
$9.1M
Evaluation of Smoke-Free Housing Policy Impacts on Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Health OutcomesR01CA220591 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHELLEY, DONNA R, THORPE, LORNA · 2018 to 2023
$8.1M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006396NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is associated with many health conditions in children and adults. Millions of individuals in the US are currently exposed to SHS in their homes. Objective: To investigate whether a federal ban on smoking in public housing settings was associated with a decrease in indoor SHS levels in New York City public housing developments 12 months after the policy's implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study tracked indoor air quality longitudinally from April 2018 to September 2019 and used difference-in-differences analysis to examine SHS exposure before vs after implementation of the 2018 federal smoke-free housing (SFH) policy in 10 New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) buildings vs 11 matched low-income buildings not subject to the SFH policy (ie, Section 8 buildings). Exposures: Federal SFH policy implementation, beginning July 30, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison of nicotine concentration levels from passive, bisulfate-coated filters before vs 12 months after implementation of the federal SFH policy. Secondary outcomes included changes in particulate matter less than 2.5 μm in diameter, measured with low-cost particle monitors, and counts of cigarette butts in common areas. Results: Air quality was measured repeatedly in a total of 153 NYCHA and 110 Section 8 nonsmoking households as well as in 91 stairwells and hallways. Before the SFH policy implementation, air nicotine was detectable in 19 of 20 stairwells (95.0%) in NYCHA buildings and 15 of 19 stairwells (78.9%) in Section 8 buildings (P = .19) and in 17 of 19 hallways (89.5%) in NYCHA buildings and 14 of 23 hallways (60.9%) in Section 8 buildings (P = .004). Nicotine was detected less frequently inside nonsmoking apartments overall (26 of 263 [9.9%]) but more frequently in NYCHA apartments (20 of 153 [13.1%]) than in Section 8 apartments (6 of 110 [5.5%]) (P = .04). One year after policy implementation, there was no differential change over time in nicotine concentrations measured in stairwells (DID, 0.03 μg/m3; 95% CI, -0.99 to 1.06 μg/m3) or inside nonsmoking households (DID, -0.04 μg/m3; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.15 μg/m3). Larger decreases in nicotine concentration were found in NYCHA hallways than in Section 8 hallways (DID, -0.43 μg/m3; 95% CI, -1.26 to 0.40 μg/m3). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that there was no differential change in SHS in NYCHA buildings 12 months after SFH policy implementation. Additional support may be needed to ensure adherence to SFH policies.

Indexed as

AdultAir PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorChildCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansMaleNew York CityNicotineParticulate MatterPublic HousingSmoke-Free PolicySurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Smoke PollutionNicotineParticulate MatterTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID33151318
PMCPMC7645700
OpenAlexW3095290974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.