Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151314›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Evaluation of Trust Within a Community After Survivor Relocation Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.

Krisztina Gero, Jun Aida, Katsunori Kondo, Ichiro Kawachi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social cohesion, social capital and mental health: current evidence and future research directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Social Capital during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Case of the Island of Menorca.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Krisztina GeroDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jun AidaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Miyagi, Japan.
Katsunori KondoCenter for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Ichiro KawachiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chiba University · JPHarvard University · USNortheastern University · USTohoku University · JP

Funding

Impact of social cohesion on functional recovery after earthquake and tsunamiR01AG042463 · NIA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI KAWACHI, ICHIRO · 2013 to 2022
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Trust is a core component of social cohesion, facilitating cooperation and collective action in the face of adversity and enabling survivors to remain resilient. Residential stability is an important prerequisite of developing trusting relations among community members. However, little is known about whether the movement of internally displaced persons (IDPs) after a disaster might change community relations. Objective: We explored perceived changes in trust within 1 community directly impacted by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study examined survey data from 3594 residents of Iwanuma City, Japan, aged 65 years or older. Data were obtained from the Iwanuma Study-part of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide cohort study established in 2010-approximately 7 months before the disaster. All Iwanuma City residents age 65 years or older (8576 residents) were eligible to participate in 2010. The response rate was 59.0% (5058 residents). A follow-up survey was conducted in 2013, approximately 2.5 years after the disaster. Of the 4380 remaining participants who answered the baseline survey, 3594 were recontacted (follow-up rate, 82.1%). Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2019, to January 9, 2020. Exposures: The number of temporarily relocated Iwanuma City survivors within 100 m and 250 m of a nonrelocated resident's home address. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perceived changes in particularized trust (ie, trusting people from the same community) and generalized trust (trusting people from other communities) measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Among 3250 nonrelocated residents (1808 [55.6%] women; mean [SD] age, 76.5 [6.2] years) of Iwanuma City included in the analytic sample, multivariable-adjusted multinomial logistic regression analyses found that each standard deviation increase in the influx of internally displaced persons (1 SD = 11 IDPs) within 250 m of a resident's home address was associated with higher odds of a decrease in the resident's particularized and generalized trust (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32). Conclusions and Relevance: The influx of IDPs in the host community appeared to be associated with an erosion of trust among locals. To avoid the erosion of social cohesion after a disaster, it may be crucial to provide opportunities for social interaction between old and new residents of communities.

Indexed as

EarthquakesPsychological DistanceTsunamisAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsTrust

Identifiers

PMID33151314
PMCPMC7645695
OpenAlexW3095019925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.