Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151150›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Amplifying Domain Expertise in Clinical Data Pipelines.

Protiva Rahman, Arnab Nandi, Courtney Hebert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Semi-Automated Data Curation from Biomedical Literature.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  9. Translational NLP: A New Paradigm and General Principles for Natural Language Processing Research.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Protiva RahmanThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0000-8558
Arnab NandiThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-603X
Courtney HebertThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-702X
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Automation and Multi-Site Validation of a Personalized Empiric Antibiotic AdvisorR01AI116975 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEBERT, COURTNEY L. · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digitization of health records has allowed the health care domain to adopt data-driven algorithms for decision support. There are multiple people involved in this process: a data engineer who processes and restructures the data, a data scientist who develops statistical models, and a domain expert who informs the design of the data pipeline and consumes its results for decision support. Although there are multiple data interaction tools for data scientists, few exist to allow domain experts to interact with data meaningfully. Designing systems for domain experts requires careful thought because they have different needs and characteristics from other end users. There should be an increased emphasis on the system to optimize the experts' interaction by directing them to high-impact data tasks and reducing the total task completion time. We refer to this optimization as amplifying domain expertise. Although there is active research in making machine learning models more explainable and usable, it focuses on the final outputs of the model. However, in the clinical domain, expert involvement is needed at every pipeline step: curation, cleaning, and analysis. To this end, we review literature from the database, human-computer information, and visualization communities to demonstrate the challenges and solutions at each of the data pipeline stages. Next, we present a taxonomy of expertise amplification, which can be applied when building systems for domain experts. This includes summarization, guidance, interaction, and acceleration. Finally, we demonstrate the use of our taxonomy with a case study.

Indexed as

clinical informaticsdata analysisdata sciencereview

Identifiers

PMID33151150
PMCPMC7677017
OpenAlexW3097720724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.