ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Amplifying Domain Expertise in Clinical Data Pipelines.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance, Failures, and Oversight of a Large Language Model Agent for Clinical Data Analysis: Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Software engineers develop better clinical applications than physicists with coding skills.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- PRIMUS: a precision medicine platform reusing clinical trials and registry data to support treatment selection in multiple sclerosis.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Toward Community-Based Natural Language Processing (CBNLP): Cocreating With Communities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Accelerated curation of checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis cases from electronic health records.JAMIA open · 2023Article
- Using similar patients to predict complication in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and lipid disorder: a domain knowledge-infused convolutional neural network approach.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 1. Data Handling.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Semi-Automated Data Curation from Biomedical Literature.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
- Translational NLP: A New Paradigm and General Principles for Natural Language Processing Research.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Digitization of health records has allowed the health care domain to adopt data-driven algorithms for decision support. There are multiple people involved in this process: a data engineer who processes and restructures the data, a data scientist who develops statistical models, and a domain expert who informs the design of the data pipeline and consumes its results for decision support. Although there are multiple data interaction tools for data scientists, few exist to allow domain experts to interact with data meaningfully. Designing systems for domain experts requires careful thought because they have different needs and characteristics from other end users. There should be an increased emphasis on the system to optimize the experts' interaction by directing them to high-impact data tasks and reducing the total task completion time. We refer to this optimization as amplifying domain expertise. Although there is active research in making machine learning models more explainable and usable, it focuses on the final outputs of the model. However, in the clinical domain, expert involvement is needed at every pipeline step: curation, cleaning, and analysis. To this end, we review literature from the database, human-computer information, and visualization communities to demonstrate the challenges and solutions at each of the data pipeline stages. Next, we present a taxonomy of expertise amplification, which can be applied when building systems for domain experts. This includes summarization, guidance, interaction, and acceleration. Finally, we demonstrate the use of our taxonomy with a case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.