Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151075›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2020

Chemical Architecture of Block Copolymers Differentially Abrogate Cardiotoxicity and Maintain the Anticancer Efficacy of Doxorubicin.

Chowdhury S Abdullah, Priyanka Ray, Shafiul Alam, Narendra Kale, Richa Aishwarya, Mahboob Morshed, Debasmita Dutta, Cathleen Hudziak, Sushanta K Banerjee, Sanku Mallik and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chowdhury S AbdullahDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States.
Priyanka RayDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-772X
Shafiul AlamDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States.
Narendra KaleDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108, United States.
Richa AishwaryaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States.
Mahboob MorshedDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States.
Debasmita DuttaDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108, United States.
Cathleen HudziakInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Takustr. 3, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Sushanta K BanerjeeCancer Research Unit, VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri 64128, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7698-0717
Sanku MallikDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4236-2512
Snigdha BanerjeeCancer Research Unit, VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri 64128, United States.
Md Shenuarin BhuiyanDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States.
Mohiuddin QuadirDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-773X
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USNorth Dakota State University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

Stress Exacerbates Myocardial Ischemic Injury by Blocking Estrogen's Antidoxidant Protection in the Female HeartP20GM121307 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI Vesna Tesic · 2018 to 2026
$23.6M
Targeting CLEC-2/podoplanin as a therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancerP20GM109024 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Megan Orr · 2016 to 2026
$20.5M
Sigmar1 in lipid metabolismR01HL145753 · NHLBI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI BHUIYAN, MD. SHENUARIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Sigma-1 receptor and cardioprotectionR00HL122354 · NHLBI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI BHUIYAN, MD. SHENUARIN · 2015 to 2017
$747k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 18POST34080495BLRD VA I01 BX001002BLRD VA I01 BX004497BLRD VA IK6 BX005769NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL122354NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL145753NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109024NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular architecture of pH-responsive amphiphilic block copolymers, their self-assembly behavior to form nanoparticles (NPs), and doxorubicin (DOX)-loading technique govern the extent of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. We observed that the choice of pH-sensitive tertiary amines, surface charge, and DOX-loading techniques within the self-assembled NPs strongly influence the release and stimulation of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in primary cardiomyocytes. However, covalent conjugation of DOX to a pH-sensitive nanocarrier through a "conditionally unstable amide" linkage (PCPY-cDOX; PC = polycarbonate and PY = 2-pyrrolidine-1-yl-ethyl-amine) significantly reduced the cardiotoxicity of DOX in cardiomyocytes as compared to noncovalently encapsulated DOX NPs (PCPY-eDOX). When these formulations were tested for drug release in serum-containing media, the PCPY-cDOX systems showed prolonged control over drug release (for ∼72 h) at acidic pH compared to DOX-encapsulated nanocarriers, as expected. We found that DOX-encapsulated nanoformulations triggered cardiotoxicity in primary cardiomyocytes more acutely, while conjugated systems such as PCPY-cDOX prevented cardiotoxicity by disabling the nuclear entry of the drug. Using 2D and 3D (spheroid) cultures of an ER + breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) and a triple-negative breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231), we unravel that, similar to encapsulated systems (PCPY-eDOX-type) as reported earlier, the PCPY-cDOX system suppresses cellular proliferation in both cell lines and enhances trafficking through 3D spheroids of MDA-MB-231 cells. Collectively, our studies indicate that PCPY-cDOX is less cardiotoxic as compared to noncovalently encapsulated variants without compromising the chemotherapeutic properties of the drug. Thus, our studies suggest that the appropriate selection of the nanocarrier for DOX delivery may prove fruitful in shifting the balance between low cardiotoxicity and triggering the chemotherapeutic potency of DOX.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornCardiotoxicityCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingDrug LiberationDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMyocytes, CardiacNanoparticlesNeoplasmsPolycarboxylate CementPolymersDoxorubicinDrug CarrierspolycarbonatePolycarboxylate CementPolymersPyrrolidinescancercardiac effectscardiotoxicitydoxorubicindrug deliverynanocarrierspH-responsive

Identifiers

PMID33151075
PMCPMC8532565
OpenAlexW3096995764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.