Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151045›Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2021

How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.

Nicolò Schifano, Paolo Capogrosso, Manuela Tutolo, Federico Dehò, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surgical tips in difficult penile prosthetic surgery: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The direct prognosis comparison ofEuropean journal of medical research · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolò SchifanoUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-4316
Paolo CapogrossoUnit of Urology, ASST Sette Laghi - Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy. paolo.capogrosso@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-9504
Manuela TutoloDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-1400
Federico DehòUnit of Urology, ASST Sette Laghi - Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-5710
Francesco MontorsiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-4181
Andrea SaloniaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-7165
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide an overview of the currently available evidence relating to the prevention and management strategies of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive research was carried out on MEDLINE/PubMed database to identify pertinent studies concerning post-RP UI. The search strategy included these words: urinary continence; urinary continence recovery; urinary incontinence; radical prostatectomy; and prostate cancer.

resultsPost-RP UI still represents a challenging issue for both urologic patients and clinicians. A complete preoperative assessment of the risk factors associated with post-RP UI aids both in counseling those patients with a higher estimated likelihood of postoperative UI and in identifying those who would probably benefit from preventive strategies in the preoperative and in the intraoperative settings. Over the last decades different surgical strategies based on either the "preservation" or the "reconstruction" of the anatomical elements responsible for urinary continence (UC) led to an overall improvement of postoperative functional outcomes. Finally, several therapeutic strategies should be evaluated for the postoperative UI management. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation represents the gold standard for treatment, notwithstanding its wide adoption is limited due to high costs and significant risk of surgical revision. In this context, male sling positioning seems the most promising strategy, in particular in mild and moderate post-RP UI.

conclusionsTo enhance the likelihood of obtaining an optimal UC recovery after RP, it is here strongly suggested to intervene throughout the overall clinical management process thus including the pre-, intra- and postoperative settings.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic neoplasmsRobotic surgical proceduresUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID33151045
PMCPMC8443978
OpenAlexW3084630513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.