Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150956›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2020

The geometry and genetics of hybridization.

Hilde Schneemann, Bianca De Sanctis, Denis Roze, Nicolas Bierne, John J Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Fisher's Geometric Model as a Tool to Study Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. JLOH: Inferring loss of heterozygosity blocks from sequencing data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  12. The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hilde SchneemannDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-9734
Bianca De SanctisDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0648-4224
Denis RozeCNRS, UMI 3614, Evolutionary Biology and Ecology of Algae, Roscoff, France.
Nicolas BierneISEM Université Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
John J WelchDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust PCGG.GAABWellcome Trust PFHZ/157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When divergent populations form hybrids, hybrid fitness can vary with genome composition, current environmental conditions, and the divergence history of the populations. We develop analytical predictions for hybrid fitness, which incorporate all three factors. The predictions are based on Fisher's geometric model, and apply to a wide range of population genetic parameter regimes and divergence conditions, including allopatry and parapatry, local adaptation, and drift. Results show that hybrid fitness can be decomposed into intrinsic effects of admixture and heterozygosity, and extrinsic effects of the (local) adaptedness of the parental lines. Effect sizes are determined by a handful of geometric distances, which have a simple biological interpretation. These distances also reflect the mode and amount of divergence, such that there is convergence toward a characteristic pattern of intrinsic isolation. We next connect our results to the quantitative genetics of line crosses in variable or patchy environments. This means that the geometrical distances can be estimated from cross data, and provides a simple interpretation of the "composite effects." Finally, we develop extensions to the model, involving selectively induced disequilibria, and variable phenotypic dominance. The geometry of fitness landscapes provides a unifying framework for understanding speciation, and wider patterns of hybrid fitness.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticModels, GeneticFisher's geometric modelhybrid fitnessline crossesquantitative geneticsspeciation

Identifiers

PMID33150956
PMCPMC7839769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.