ArticleWestern journal of nursing research2021
Developing and Establishing Content Validity of Vignettes for Health Care Education and Research.
Article in Western journal of nursing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom Profiles Influence Accurate Identification of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID).Journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring sensitive topics in assessment research through vignette-based interviewing.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A Multi-AI Agent Framework for Interactive Neurosurgical Education and Evaluation: From Vignettes to Virtual Conversations.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Cultural Spanish adaptation, factor structure, and reliability of implementation science instruments for suicide prevention.Psychological services · 2025Article
- Effect of an Online Educational Program on Nurses' Knowledge of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of the active senior program in preparing for physical deterioration and quality aging among pre-older adults in Prachin Buri Province, Thailand: A quasi-experimental study.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of an ICU Delirium Playbook for Provider Education.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Testing the Decision Support Tool for Responsible Pain Management for Headache and Facial Pain Diagnosis with Opioid-Risk-Stratified Treatment.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Nociplastic Pain Criteria or Recognition of Central Sensitization? Pain Phenotyping in the Past, Present and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Public Health Nurses in an Internal Negotiation Process When There Is Concern About the Child's Care.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of vignettes in research and education is well documented. Documentation of how vignettes are developed and content validity is established, however, are rare. The purpose of this paper is to describe a method for development and establishing content validity of vignettes that can be used to assess student performance and research participant outcomes. This three-phase method was designed to validate seven vignettes for a future research project. Content validity index survey and expert panel interviews were used to inform improvements in validity. Findings showed that clinical vignettes were improved with respect to content relevance (from 0.93 to 0.96) and importance (from 0.68 to 0.93). Developing validated vignettes is essential when used to measure outcomes in education and in research. This three-phase method of vignette development and validation is feasible and effective in improving content validity of vignettes and can be used in other education and research projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.