ReviewJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
Effects of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells: environmental factors affecting cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation and their mechanisms.
Review in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of the osteogenic effect of rare earth nanomaterials and the underlying mechanisms.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Pooled it
- Nanofibrous-Composite Hydrogels for Modulating Stem Cell Behavior.Cells, tissues, organs · 2026Review
- Biological scaffold as potential platforms for stem cells: Current development and applications in wound healing.World journal of stem cells · 2024Review
- Article
- [Differentiation of stem cells regulated by biophysical cues].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023Article
- Overview of the main biological mechanisms linked to changes in periodontal ligament stem cells and the inflammatory microenvironment.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2023Review
- 3D-Printing of Silk Nanofibrils Reinforced Alginate for Soft Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Mechanobiology-informed biomaterial and tissue engineering strategies for influencing skeletal stem and progenitor cell fate.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Surface Modifications of High-Performance Polymer Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to Improve Its Biological Performance in Dentistry.Polymers · 2022Review
- Non-coding RNA delivery for bone tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and potential solutions.iScience · 2022Review
- Physical optimization of cell proliferation and differentiation using spinner flask and microcarriers.AMB Express · 2022Article
- Modification of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) physical features to improve osteointegration.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2022Review
- Article
- Research progress on the biological modifications of implant materials in 3D printed intervertebral fusion cages.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Review
- From the Matrix to the Nucleus and Back: Mechanobiology in the Light of Health, Pathologies, and Regeneration of Oral Periodontal Tissues.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Osteogenic effects of antihypertensive drug benidipine on mouse MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanofibers can mimic natural tissue structure by creating a more suitable environment for cells to grow, prompting a wide application of nanofiber materials. In this review, we include relevant studies and characterize the effect of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells, as well as factors that affect cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation. We hypothesize that the process of bone regeneration in vitro is similar to bone formation and healing in vivo, and the closer nanofibers or nanofibrous scaffolds are to natural bone tissue, the better the bone regeneration process will be. In general, cells cultured on nanofibers have a similar gene expression pattern and osteogenic behavior as cells induced by osteogenic supplements in vitro. Genes involved in cell adhesion (focal adhesion kinase (FAK)), cytoskeletal organization, and osteogenic pathways (transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/bone morphogenic protein (BMP), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Wnt) are upregulated successively. Cell adhesion and osteogenesis may be influenced by several factors. Nanofibers possess certain physical properties including favorable hydrophilicity, porosity, and swelling properties that promote cell adhesion and growth. Moreover, nanofiber stiffness plays a vital role in cell fate, as cell recruitment for osteogenesis tends to be better on stiffer scaffolds, with associated signaling pathways of integrin and Yes-associated protein (YAP)/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). Also, hierarchically aligned nanofibers, as well as their combination with functional additives (growth factors, HA particles, etc.), contribute to osteogenesis and bone regeneration. In summary, previous studies have indicated that upon sensing the stiffness of the nanofibrous environment as well as its other characteristics, stem cells change their shape and tension accordingly, regulating downstream pathways followed by adhesion to nanofibers to contribute to osteogenesis. However, additional experiments are needed to identify major signaling pathways in the bone regeneration process, and also to fully investigate its supportive role in fabricating or designing the optimum tissue-mimicking nanofibrous scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.