Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150591›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2021

Model-Informed Drug Development for Antimicrobials: Translational PK and PK/PD Modeling to Predict an Efficacious Human Dose for Apramycin.

Tomás Sou, Jon Hansen, Edgars Liepinsh, Maria Backlund, Onur Ercan, Solveiga Grinberga, Sha Cao, Paraskevi Giachou, Anna Petersson, Magdalena Tomczak and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Tomás SouPharmacometrics, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jon HansenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Edgars LiepinshLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Maria BacklundDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University Drug Optimization and Pharmaceutical Profiling, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Onur ErcanDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Solveiga GrinbergaLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Riga, Latvia.
Sha CaoDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Paraskevi GiachouDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna PeterssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Magdalena TomczakDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Malgorzata UrbasDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Dorota ZabickaDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Carina Vingsbo LundbergDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diarmaid HughesDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sven N HobbieInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lena E FribergPharmacometrics, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SENarodowy Instytut Leków · PLLatvijas Organiskās Sintēzes Institūts · LVStatens Serum Institut · DKUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apramycin represents a subclass of aminoglycoside antibiotics that has been shown to evade almost all mechanisms of clinically relevant aminoglycoside resistance. Model-informed drug development may facilitate its transition from preclinical to clinical phase. This study explored the potential of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling to maximize the use of in vitro time-kill and in vivo preclinical data for prediction of a human efficacious dose (HED) for apramycin. PK model parameters of apramycin from four different species (mouse, rat, guinea pig, and dog) were allometrically scaled to humans. A semimechanistic PK/PD model was developed from the rich in vitro data on four Escherichia coli strains and subsequently the sparse in vivo efficacy data on the same strains were integrated. An efficacious human dose was predicted from the PK/PD model and compared with the classical PK/PD index methodology and the aminoglycoside dose similarity. One-compartment models described the PK data and human values for clearance and volume of distribution were predicted to 7.07 L/hour and 26.8 L, respectively. The required fAUC/MIC (area under the unbound drug concentration-time curve over MIC ratio) targets for stasis and 1-log kill in the thigh model were 34.5 and 76.2, respectively. The developed PK/PD model predicted the efficacy data well with strain-specific differences in susceptibility, maximum bacterial load, and resistance development. All three dose prediction approaches supported an apramycin daily dose of 30 mg/kg for a typical adult patient. The results indicate that the mechanistic PK/PD modeling approach can be suitable for HED prediction and serves to efficiently integrate all available efficacy data with potential to improve predictive capacity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBacteriological TechniquesDogsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEscherichia coliGuinea PigsMiceModels, BiologicalNebramycinRatsAnti-Bacterial AgentsapramycinNebramycin

Identifiers

PMID33150591
PMCPMC8048880
OpenAlexW3097297180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.