Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150575›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2021

Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

Dina Ali, Megan E Barra, Joseph Blunck, Gretchen M Brophy, Caitlin S Brown, Meghan Caylor, Sarah L Clark, David Hensler, Mathew Jones, Amanda Lamer-Rosen and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Dina AliUniversity of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, USA. Dina.ali@uky.edu.
Megan E BarraMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Joseph BlunckSaint Luke's Health System-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA.
Gretchen M BrophyVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Caitlin S BrownMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Meghan CaylorHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Sarah L ClarkMayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
David HenslerUniversity of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, USA.
Mathew JonesHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
Amanda Lamer-RosenCedars-Sinai Hospital, Los Angeles, USA.
Melissa LevesqueTampa General Hospital, Tampa, USA.
Leana N MahmoudLifespan/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.
Sherif H MahmoudUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Casey MayOhio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Keith NguyenEdward-Elmhurst Hospital, Chicago, USA.
Nicholas PanosRush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Christina RoelsNovant Health, Winston-Salem, USA.
Justin ShewmakerSaint Luke's Health System-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA.
Keaton SmetanaOhio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Jessica TraegerUniversity Hospitals, Shaker Heights, USA.
Aric ShadlerUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, USA.
Aaron M CookUniversity of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-902X
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USSaint Luke's Health System · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Kentucky HealthCare · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USEdward Hospital · USHenry Ford Hospital · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNovant Health · USProvidence College · USRush University Medical Center · USShaker Heights Public Library · USTampa General Hospital · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Michigan · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveStress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB) occurs in approximately 2-4% of critically ill patients. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) have a (diffuse) space-occupying lesion, are critically ill, often require mechanical ventilation, and frequently receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy after aneurysm embolization, all of which may be risk factors for SRMB. However, no studies have evaluated SRMB in patients with aSAH. Aims of the study were to determine the incidence of SRMB in aSAH patients, evaluate the effect of acid suppression on SRMB, and identify specific risk factors for SRMB.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted across 17 centers. Each center reviewed up to 50 of the most recent cases of aSAH. Patients with length of stay (LOS) < 48 h or active GI bleeding on admission were excluded. Variables related to demographics, aSAH severity, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, provision of SRMB prophylaxis, adverse events, intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital LOS were collected for the first 21 days of admission or until hospital discharge, whichever came first. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. A multivariate logistic regression modeling was utilized to examine the relationship between specific risk factors and the incidence of clinically important GI bleeding in patients with aSAH.

resultsA total of 627 patients were included. The overall incidence of clinically important GI bleeding was 4.9%. Of the patients with clinically important GI bleeding, 19 (61%) received pharmacologic prophylaxis prior to evidence of GI bleeding, while 12 (39%) were not on pharmacologic prophylaxis at the onset of GI bleeding. Patients who received an acid suppressant agent were less likely to experience GI bleeding than patients who did not receive pharmacologic prophylaxis prior to evidence of bleeding (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.83). The multivariate regression analysis identified any instance of elevated intracranial pressure, creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min and the incidence of cerebral vasospasm as specific risk factors associated with GI bleeding. Cerebral vasospasm has not previously been described as a risk for GI bleeding (OR 2.5 95% CI 1.09-5.79).

conclusionsClinically important GI bleeding occurred in 4.9% of patients with aSAH, similar to the general critical care population. Risk factors associated with GI bleeding were prolonged mechanical ventilation (> 48 h), creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min, presence of coagulopathy, elevation of intracranial pressure, and cerebral vasospasm. Further prospective research is needed to confirm this observation within this patient population.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAcid-suppressive therapyCerebral vasospasmGastrointestinal hemorrhageHistamine-2-receptor antagonistsNeurocritical careProton pump inhibitorsStress ulcer prophylaxisSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID33150575
OpenAlexW3097047297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.