Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150570›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2021

Effectiveness of Perindopril/Indapamide Single-Pill Combination in Uncontrolled Patients with Hypertension: A Pooled Analysis of the FORTISSIMO, FORSAGE, ACES and PICASSO Observational Studies.

Csaba András Dézsi, Maria Glezer, Yuri Karpov, Romualda Brzozowska-Villatte, Csaba Farsang

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine in Hypertension: A Profile of Its Use.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Csaba András DézsiDivision of Cardiology Győr, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary. dcsa62@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-0423
Maria GlezerDepartment of Cardiology, Functional and Ultrasonic Diagnostics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Yuri KarpovNational Medical Research Centre of Cardiology, 3rd Cherepkovskaya str., 15A, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-0458
Romualda Brzozowska-VillatteGlobal Medical Affairs Servier, Suresnes, France.
Csaba FarsangSemmelweis Medical University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur objective was to determine the effectiveness of a perindopril/indapamide (Per/Ind) single-pill combination (SPC) in a broad range of patient profiles, including subgroups with varying hypertension severity, age and cardiovascular risk profiles.

methodsPatient data from four large prospective observational studies (FORTISSIMO, FORSAGE, PICASSO, ACES) were pooled. In each study, patients already treated for hypertension were switched to Per/Ind 10/2.5 mg SPC and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) measured at the 1-month (M1) and 3-month (M3) visits. Study endpoints included change in SBP and DBP from baseline to M1 and M3 and the percentage of patients achieving BP control (SBP/DBP < 140/90 mmHg for patients without diabetes or < 140/85 mmHg for patients with diabetes).

resultsA total of 16,763 patients were enrolled and received Per/Ind (94% received the full dose of 10/2.5). Mean patient age was 61.4 years (36% were ≥ 65 years old), 57% were women, and 16% had isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Mean baseline office SBP/DBP was 162/94 mmHg, and mean duration of hypertension was 11 years. Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbid conditions were common in this population. Significant mean reductions in SBP (- 23 mmHg) and DBP (- 11 mmHg) were observed at M1 compared with baseline (P < 0.001), which were maintained at M3 (- 30 mmHg and - 14 mmHg, respectively). At M3, BP control was achieved by 70% of patients (78% for ISH). In patients with SBP ≥ 180 mmHg at baseline (grade III hypertension), the mean SBP/DBP decrease was - 51/- 20 mmHg and 53% achieved BP control. Per/Ind was well tolerated with an overall rate of adverse events of 1.3%, most frequently cough and dizziness at rates of 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively.

conclusionIn this hypertensive population including difficult-to-control patient subgroups, switching to Per/Ind 10/2.5 mg SPC led to rapid and important reductions in BP. BP control was achieved in 70% of patients overall in an everyday practice context.

Indexed as

HypertensionIndapamideAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerindoprilTaurineTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsDrug CombinationsIndapamideN-(2-acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acidPerindoprilTaurineAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorBlood pressure controlCardiovascular riskDiabetesHypertensionIndapamidePerindoprilSingle-pill combinationThiazide-like diuretic

Identifiers

PMID33150570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.