Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150414›Full record

ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2020

Teleneuropsychology for Monolingual and Bilingual Spanish-Speaking Adults in the Time of COVID-19: Rationale, Professional Considerations, and Resources.

Franchesca Arias, Diomaris E Safi, Michelle Miranda, Carmen I Carrión, Ana L Diaz Santos, Victoria Armendariz, Irene E Jose, Kevin D Vuong, Paola Suarez, Adriana M Strutt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Preliminary Findings from a Telephone-Based Cognitive Screening of an Adult HIV Research Cohort during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Franchesca AriasHinda & Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, The Aging Brain Center, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA 02131, USA.
Diomaris E SafiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Michelle MirandaDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Carmen I CarriónDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Ana L Diaz SantosBaylor College of Medicine Cerebro, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Victoria ArmendarizBaylor College of Medicine Cerebro, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Irene E JoseBaylor College of Medicine Cerebro, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Kevin D VuongBaylor College of Medicine Cerebro, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Paola SuarezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Adriana M StruttBaylor College of Medicine Cerebro, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
STAR Consortium

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeuropsychological assessments with monolingual Spanish and bilingual Spanish/English-speaking adults present unique challenges. Barriers include, but are not limited to, the paucity of test norms, uncertainty about the equivalence of translated neuropsychological tests, and limited proficiency in the provision of culturally competent services. Similar issues generalize to telephone- and video-based administration of neuropsychological tests or teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) with Hispanics/Latinos (as), and few studies have examined its feasibility and validity in this group. The sudden onset of the COVID-19 pandemic prompted neuropsychologists to identify alternative ways to provide equitable care. Clinicians providing TeleNP to this population during (and after) the pandemic must consider safety, professional factors, and systemic barriers to accessing and benefitting from virtual modalities.

methodThis clinical process manuscript describes how cross-cultural neuropsychologists across five U.S. academic institutions serving Hispanics/Latinos (as) developed TeleNP models of care during the pandemic.

resultsWorkflows, test batteries, and resources for TeleNP assessment with monolingual and bilingual Spanish-speaking patients are included. Factors guiding model development and informing decisions to incorporate virtual administration of neuropsychological tests into their practice are also discussed.

conclusionsProvision of TeleNP is a promising modality. Additional research in this area is warranted with focus on cultural and contextual factors that support or limit the use of TeleNP with this community.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultCOVID-19Cross-cultural MinoritySpanish-speaking PatientsTeleneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID33150414
PMCPMC7665473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.