Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150226›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2020

A comparative profile of oropharyngeal colonization of

G N Amritha, N Meenakshi, R Alice Peace Selvabai, Priyadarshini Shanmugam, Perumal Jayaraman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization in health care professionals at a tertiary university pediatric hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G N AmrithaMBBS, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kancheepuram, India.
N MeenakshiDepartment of Respiratory and Thoracic Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kancheepuram, India.
R Alice Peace SelvabaiDepartment of Microbiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kancheepuram, India.
Priyadarshini ShanmugamDepartment of Microbiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kancheepuram, India.
Perumal JayaramanChettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kancheepuram, India.
Chettinad Health City · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStreptococcus pneumoniae and Hemophilus influenzae are two major bacterial human pathogens responsible for causing both acute respiratory tract and life threatening invasive infections. Oropharyngeal carriage of these isolates can lead to its transmission frequently in healthcare settings between patients and HealthCare workers (HCW) and also common among population living in crowded communities resulting in serious invasive infections. Furthermore, awareness about preventive measures including appropriate vaccination against these bacterial infections, oropharyngeal carrier status, prevalent serotypes and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern these bacterial strains among HCW and Non-HCW in the community in India remains inadequate. Therefore the current study is aimed to understand the prevalence of oropharyngeal carrier status, prevalent serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of these organisms among HCW and non-HCW.

methodsA total of 200 oropharyngeal swabs were collected from HealthCare Workers and 200 from Non-Health care individuals of age 18 to 70. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile was studied for Pneumococci and H. influenzae. Specific serotypes for the carrier isolates of Pneumococci were identified using primers appropriate to the prevalent serotypes by multiplex PCR.

resultsAbout 30% of the HCW were colonized with S.pneumoniae and H. influenzae (P ≤ 0.0001). Out of which 19% of them were S.pneumoniae and 11% were H. influenzae. A total of 23% of the Non-HCW was colonized with S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Out of which 16% had pneumococcal carriage and 7% had H. influenzae. Individuals in the age group 56-70 years had significantly a greater prevalence rate when compared to young people (P = 0.0014). Thus in this study 30% of the HCW and 23% of the Non-HCW were colonized with S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Both Pneumococci and H. influenzae showed 100% susceptibility to Penicillin and other cephalosporins. However, Pneumococcal isolates from HCW showed better susceptibility towards erythromycin & clindamycin whereas isolates from Non- HCW showed better susceptibility towards ofloxacin and tetracycline. Serotypes detected in our study include 19F, 3, 1 and 5.

conclusionsThe present study gives a greater prevalence rate of S.pneumoniae and H. influenzae among HCW when compared to Non-HCW. This will definitely increase horizontal spread of infections and further accelerate the occupational risk. Increased carrier state prevalence among old age group underscores the importance of vaccination among these individuals.

Indexed as

Carrier StateHaemophilus InfectionsHealth PersonnelPneumococcal InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDelivery of Health CareHaemophilus influenzaeHumansIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNasopharynxStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsHaemophilus influenzaeHealth care workersOropharyngeal carriageStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID33150226
PMCPMC7595066
OpenAlexW3095471466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.