ArticleCureus2020
Validation of Self-Reported Smoking Status Among Orthopedic Hip Surgery Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of self-reported non-smoking status in subjects undergoing elective orthopedic surgery as confirmed by serum cotinine levels. Methods Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective review of consecutive subjects that underwent elective orthopedic surgery by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon. All patients provided smoking history (active, former, or non-smoker). Serum cotinine levels defined each subject as "non-smoker", "passive tobacco exposure", or "active smoker". Self-reported non-smokers were eligible for inclusion. Subjects were excluded if they failed to provide smoking history, reported themselves as "smokers", and/or had unavailable serum cotinine levels. Self-reported non-smoking status accuracy was determined by dividing the total number of included subjects by the number of subjects that were defined as "non-smoker" or "passive tobacco exposure" on their serum cotinine test. Results A total of 378 patients (mean age of 42.5 (13-78) years and 68% female) self-reported as non-smokers and were included. A total of 369 subjects had serum cotinine levels consistent with "non-smoking" resulting in a self-reported non-smoking status accuracy of 97.6%. None of the former smokers had cotinine levels consistent with active smoker status. Conclusion Subjects undergoing elective orthopedic surgery self-report as non-smokers with an accuracy of 97.6%. This suggests that routine serum cotinine testing of non-smokers in this patient population may not be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.