Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33150051›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Corneal Biomechanics After Intrastromal Ring Surgery: Optomechanical In Silico Assessment.

Miguel Ángel Ariza-Gracia, Julio Flecha-Lescún, Philippe Büchler, Begoña Calvo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unraveling the impact of laser refractive surgery on corneal ectasia: anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel Ángel Ariza-GraciaARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Julio Flecha-LescúnAragón Institute for Engineering Research (i3A), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Philippe BüchlerARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Begoña CalvoAragón Institute for Engineering Research (i3A), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
University of Bern · CHBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a biomechanical framework to better understand the postsurgical optomechanical behavior of the cornea after ring implantation. Methods: Calibrated in silico models were used to determine the corneal shape and stresses after ring implantation. After mechanical simulations, geometric ray-tracing was used to determine the change in spherical equivalent. The effect of the surgical procedure, circadian variation of intraocular pressure, or the biomechanical weakening introduced by keratoconus (KC) were evaluated for each intrastromal ring. Results: Models predicted the postsurgical optomechanical response of the cornea at a population level. The localized mechanical effect of the additional intrastromal volume introduced by the implants (size and diameter) drives the postsurgical corneal response. However, central corneal stresses did not increase more than 50%, and thus implants did not strengthen the cornea globally. Because of the biomechanical weakening introduced by laser pocketing, continuous implants in a pocket resulted in higher refractive corrections and in the relaxation of the anterior stroma, which could slow down KC progression. Implants can move within the stroma, acting as a dynamic pivot point that modifies corneal kinematics and flattens the corneal center. Changes in stromal mechanical properties did not impact on refraction for normal or pathological corneas. Conclusions: Implants do not stiffen the cornea but create a local bulkening effect that regularizes the corneal shape by modifying corneal kinematics without canceling corneal motion. Translational Relevance: In silico models can help to understand corneal biomechanics, to plan patient-specific interventions, or to create biomechanically driven nomograms.

Indexed as

CorneaCorneal StromaBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationCorneal TopographyHumanscorneal biomechanicshigh myopiain silico modelsintrastromal implantskeratoconus

Identifiers

PMID33150051
PMCPMC7585389
OpenAlexW3094622447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.