ReviewDermatology practical & conceptual2020
Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopy of Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dermoscopically informed deep learning model for classification of actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Actinic keratosis: comprehensive review of current treatments and emerging therapeutic innovations.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2025Review
- Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Dermoscopy for the Diagnosis of Solitary Hypopigmented Pink Lesions: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Review
- Innovation in Actinic Keratosis Assessment: Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach to LC-OCT PRO Score Evaluation.Cancers · 2023Article
- Comparison of reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field optical coherence tomography for the identification of keratinocyte skin tumours.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023Article
- Dermoscopy in the diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoma (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Rosette or Four Dot Signs in Dermoscopy: a Non-specific Observation.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2022Article
- Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography for actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma: a descriptive study.Clinical and experimental dermatology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDermoscopy is a tool that aids clinicians in the diagnosis of actinic keratosis; however, few diagnostic accuracy studies have determined its sensitivity and specificity for this diagnosis.
objectiveDetermine the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy on actinic keratosis.
methodsA systematic review was conducted on EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials from inception to August 2019.
resultsWe screened 485 titles and abstracts. Two studies comprising 219 actinic keratoses were eligible for qualitative analysis. The number and heterogeneity of included studies limited a quantitative analysis.
conclusionsStudies that focus specifically on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for actinic keratosis are lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.