ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
Nanometer precise red blood cell sizing using a cost-effective quantitative dark field imaging system.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quadrant darkfield for label-free imaging of intracellular puncta.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Quadrant darkfield (QDF) for label-free imaging of intracellular puncta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Blood Coagulation by Optical Vortex Tracking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysis of polarized diffraction images of human red blood cells: a numerical study.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of the bulk, complexity, calibration requirements, and need for operator training, most current flow-based blood counting devices are not appropriate for field use. Standard imaging methods could be much more compact, inexpensive, and with minimal calibration requirements. However, due to the diffraction limit, imaging lacks the nanometer precision required to measure red blood cell volumes. To address this challenge, we utilize Mie scattering, which can measure nanometer-scale morphological information from cells, in a dark-field imaging geometry. The approach consists of a custom-built dark-field scattering microscope with symmetrically oblique illumination at a precisely defined angle to record wide-field images of diluted and sphered blood samples. Scattering intensities of each cell under three wavelengths are obtained by segmenting images via digital image processing. These scattering intensities are then used to determine size and hemoglobin information via Mie theory and machine learning. Validation on 90 clinical blood samples confirmed the ability to obtain mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and red cell distribution width (RDW) with high accuracy. Simulations based on historical data suggest that an instrument with the accuracy achieved in this study could be used for widespread anemia screening.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.