ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
Skull acoustic aberration correction in photoacoustic microscopy using a vector space similarity model: a proof-of-concept simulation study.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale photoacoustic imaging of stroke in preclinical models and future directions toward clinical translation [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2026Review
- A Comparative Study on Signal Decomposition Techniques for Stimulated Raman Photoacoustic Microscopy.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Characterize Skull Physical Properties: A Phantom Study.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Development and characterization of transfontanelle photoacoustic imaging system for detection of intracranial hemorrhages and measurement of brain oxygenation:Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Photoacoustic imaging for microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2022Review
- The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Couplants in Acoustic Biosensing Systems.Chemosensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Photoacoustic imaging aided with deep learning: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2022Review
- Impact of skin tone on photoacoustic oximetry and tools to minimize bias.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Wavelength and pulse energy optimization for detecting hypoxia in photoacoustic imaging of the neonatal brain: a simulation study.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Direct measurement of neuronal ensemble activity using photoacoustic imaging in the stimulated Fos-LacZ transgenic rat brain: A proof-of-principle study.Photoacoustics · 2021Article
- Photoacoustic imaging for monitoring of stroke diseases: A review.Photoacoustics · 2021Review
- Photoacoustic computed tomography for functional human brain imaging [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2021Review
- Acoustic impact of the human skull on transcranial photoacoustic imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- A Skull-Removed Chronic Cranial Window for Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of the Rodent Brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skull bone represents a highly acoustical impedance mismatch and a dispersive barrier for the propagation of acoustic waves. Skull distorts the amplitude and phase information of the received waves at different frequencies in a transcranial brain imaging. We study a novel algorithm based on vector space similarity model for the compensation of the skull-induced distortions in transcranial photoacoustic microscopy. The results of the algorithm tested on a simplified numerical skull phantom, demonstrate a fully recovered vasculature with the recovery rate of 91.9%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.