Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33149943›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2020

Limited Vitrectomy versus Complete Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes: A Comparative Multicenter Trial.

Matteo Forlini, Purva Date, Domenico D'Eliseo, Paolo Rossini, Adriana Bratu, Andrea Volinia, Giovanni Neri, Tommaso Verdina, Maria Rosaria Carbotti, Gian Maria Cavallini and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How much vitrectomy is enough? A narrative review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Intravitreal injection of methotrexate in persistent diabetic macular edema: a 6-month study.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo ForliniDivision of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, CA, USA.
Purva DateValvekar Medical & Research Centre, Solapur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-0149
Domenico D'EliseoDepartment of Ophthalmology, "S. Maria delle Croci" Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Paolo RossiniDepartment of Ophthalmology, "S. Maria delle Croci" Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Adriana BratuDepartment of Ophthalmology, "S. Maria delle Croci" Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Andrea VoliniaDepartment of Ophthalmology, "S. Maria delle Croci" Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Giovanni NeriInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Tommaso VerdinaInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-4485
Maria Rosaria CarbottiInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Gian Maria CavalliniInstitute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Luigi SborgiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alessandra GaleoneDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Aurelio ImburgiaDivision of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, CA, USA.
Alessandro MularoniDivision of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, CA, USA.
Alessandro MeduriClinic of Ophthalmology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of the Republic of San Marino · SMUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether limited vitrectomy is as effective as complete vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to compare the surgical times and rates of complications.

methodsIn this multicentre European study, data of eyes with ERM that underwent vitrectomy from January 2017 to July 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. In the limited vitrectomy group, a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was induced up till the equator as opposed to complete PVD induction till the vitreous base in the comparison group. Incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks, retinal detachment, surgical time, and visual outcomes were compared between groups.

resultsWe included 139 eyes in the analysis with a mean age being 72.2 ± 6.9 years. In this, sixty-five eyes (47%) underwent limited vitrectomy and 74 eyes (53%) underwent complete vitrectomy. Iatrogenic retinal tears were seen in both groups (5% in limited vitrectomy versus 7% in complete vitrectomy,

conclusionA limited vitrectomy is a time-efficient and effective surgical procedure for removal of epiretinal membrane with no additional complications.

Identifiers

PMID33149943
PMCPMC7603613
OpenAlexW3093952110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.