ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
FAST accuracy in major pelvic fractures for decision-making of abdominal exploration: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limitations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Pelvic Trauma: A Retrospective Review of False-Positive Results and Non-Therapeutic Laparotomies.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Control of pelvic fracture-related hemorrhage.Surgery open science · 2022Article
- Imaging Review of Pelvic Ring Fractures and Its Complications in High-Energy Trauma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST).Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor pelvic fractures are often associated with intra-abdominal organ injuries. Considering patients' hemodynamic status, Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) can facilitate decision-making for abdominal exploration. Non-therapeutic exploratory laparotomy from pelvic fractures should be avoided. Aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of FAST in diagnosing significant intraabdominal hemorrhage that leads to determine whether or not to pursue therapeutic abdominal exploration in patients with major pelvic fractures. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe systematically reviewed the PubMed and SCOPUS databases from 2009 to 2019 and also using a retrospective review of patients admitted to the Acute Care Surgery service from 2016 to 2019. We performed a meta-analysis by using a random effects model.
resultsA total 677 patients were analyzed, 28 cases from our hospital. Mean patient age was 40.8 years. Leading mechanism of injury were motor vehicle collision (44.72%), fall from height (13.41%), and motorcycle collision (13.69%). Average injury severity score (ISS) was 32.5 (range: 24.1-50), and overall mortality rate was 11.65%. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FAST to identify significant intra-abdominal hemorrhage was 79%,90%, and 93%, respectively (95% confidence interval: 89%-94%). Meta-regression revealed no significant correlation between injury severity score and the accuracy of FAST.
conclusionOur meta-analysis revealed that FAST in major pelvic fracture accurately detected significant intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Using FAST in the presence of unstable hemodynamics, we can decide to perform abdominal exploration with the expectation of finding significant intra-abdominal hemorrhage require surgically control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.