Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33149828›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2020

Does Community- or University-Based Residency Sponsorship Affect Graduate Perceived Preparation or Performance?

Peter J Carek, Lisa Mims, Stacey Kirkpatrick, Maribeth P Williams, Runzhi Zhang, Benjamin Rooks, Susmita Datta, Lars E Peterson, Arch G Mainous

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter J Carek
Lisa Mims
Stacey Kirkpatrick
Maribeth P Williams
Runzhi Zhang
Benjamin Rooks
Susmita Datta
Lars E Peterson
Arch G Mainous

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidency training occurs in varied settings. Whether there are differences in the training received by graduates of community- or medical school-based programs has been the subject of debate.

objectiveThis study examined the perceived preparation for practice, scope of practice, and American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) board examination pass rates of family physicians in relation to the type of residency program (community, medical school, or partnership) in which they trained.

methodsPredetermined survey responses were abstracted from the 2016 and 2017 National Family Medicine Graduate Survey of ABFM and linked to data about residency programs obtained from the websites of national organizations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and logistic regression to examine differences between survey results based on type of residency training: community, medical school, or partnership.

resultsDifferences in the perception of preparation as well as current scope of practice were noted for the 3 residency types. The differences in perception were mainly noted in hospital-based skills, such as intubation and ventilator management, and in women's health and family planning services, with different program types increasing preparedness perception in different domains.

conclusionsIn general, graduates of family medicine community-based, non-affiliated, and partnership programs perceived they were prepared for and were providing more of the services queried in the survey than graduates of medical school-based programs.

Indexed as

Organizational AffiliationAdultCertificationCommunity Health ServicesFamily PracticeFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePhysicians, FamilySurveys and QuestionnairesTraining Support

Identifiers

PMID33149828
PMCPMC7594780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.