Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33149715›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Case reports2020

Epipericardial Fat Necrosis: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.

Synnøve Gjelsten Mortensen, Petr Buchmann, Knut Tore Lappegård

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fundamentals of Acute Pericarditis: State of the Art.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A twisted diagnosis of chest pain: the prominent role of coronary computed tomography.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Epipericardial Fat Necrosis and Covid-19.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Synnøve Gjelsten MortensenDepartment of Medicine, Nordland Hospital HF, Bodø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-2865
Petr BuchmannDepartment of Radiology, Nordland Hospital HF, Bodø, Norway.
Knut Tore LappegårdDepartment of Medicine, Nordland Hospital HF, Bodø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-7791
Nordland Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epipericardial fat necrosis (EFN), also known as pericardial or mediastinal fat necrosis, has until lately been considered an unusual cause of acute chest pain. Due to increased use of computed tomography (CT) and other imaging techniques, EFN is now believed to be an under-diagnosed cause of acute chest pain. We here present a patient with a short history of acute, left-sided pleuritic chest pain and dyspnoea, with total resolution of symptoms upon few days with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) treatment. Chest X-ray showed a paracardial opacity with ipsilateral pleural effusion, echocardiography revealed features of EFN, and CT scan demonstrated the cardinal lesion of EFN-an ovoid, fat-containing paracardial mass with surrounding inflammatory stranding. There was a near to full radiological resolution in 3 weeks.

Indexed as

acute chest painchest painEpipericardial fat necrosisfat necrosismediastinal fat necrosispericardial fat necrosispleuritic chest pain

Identifiers

PMID33149715
PMCPMC7580134
OpenAlexW3094749509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.