Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33149375›Full record

ArticleEarly childhood research quarterly

The Educare intervention: Outcomes at age 3.

Noreen Yazejian, Donna M Bryant, Laura J Kuhn, Margaret Burchinal, Diane Horm, Sydney Hans, Nancy File, Barbara Jackson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early childhood research quarterly. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Effects of Age, Dosage, and Poverty on Second Language Learning through SparkLingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Noreen YazejianUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Donna M BryantUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Laura J KuhnUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Margaret BurchinalUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Diane HormUniversity of Oklahoma-Tulsa, United States.
Sydney HansUniversity of Chicago, United States.
Nancy FileUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, United States.
Barbara JacksonUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Tulsa · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of Educare, a center-based early education program, in improving child outcomes at age 3 was evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Educare programs serve children from birth to age 5 and are designed to reduce the achievement gap between children from low-income families and their more advantaged peers. This study began following 239 children from low-income families who were randomly assigned as infants (<19 months) to Educare or a business-as-usual control group. At age 3, assessments of the skills of 202 children remaining in the study revealed significant differences in favor of children in the treatment group on auditory language skills, early math skills, and parent-reported problem behaviors. Effect sizes were in the modest range, although not as strong as the previously reported age 2 findings. No effects were found for observations of parent-child interactions, observer-rated child behaviors, or parent-rated social competence. For English-language skills, children who were dual language learners (DLLs) benefitted more from treatment than non-DLLs. Analyses of outcomes by child care type, regardless of treatment group assignment, showed that children in Educare had better language, math, and behavioral scores than children in less formal care, whereas children in other center-based care only had higher language scores than children in less formal care. Differences in outcomes between Educare and other center-based care were not significant.

Indexed as

Achievement gapCenter-Based careInfants and toddlersIntervention

Identifiers

PMID33149375
PMCPMC7593987
OpenAlexW3036405032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.