Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33149346›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2020

Implementation Science to Advance Practice and Curricular Transformation: Report of the 2019-2020 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.

Grace Kuo Chair, Jennifer L Bacci, Michelle A Chui, Joel Farley, Peter M Gannett, Sheldon G Holstad, Melanie Livet, Dorothy Farrell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research and Scholarly Methods: Implementation Science Studies.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Grace Kuo ChairOregon State University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, Oregon.
Jennifer L BacciUniversity of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington.
Michelle A ChuiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Joel FarleyUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Peter M GannettNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Sheldon G HolstadAmerican College of Clinical Pharmacy, Lenexa, Kansas.
Melanie LivetUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Dorothy FarrellAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Arlington, Virginia.
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy · USAmerican College of Clinical Pharmacy · USNova Southeastern University · USOregon State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2019-2020 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee (RGAC) was charged with articulating the case for and evaluating the state of implementation science in academic pharmacy, given the potential for implementation science to act as a driver of practice and curricular transformation. Based on the current state of pharmacy research in this area, the RGAC was further charged with outlining a plan to raise the profile of implementation science with pharmacy leadership and defining strategies for AACP to facilitate schools in applying its methods to their practice and education missions. For this work, the RGAC considered implementation science to be the scientific study of methods and strategies to promote adoption of evidence-based practices and interventions into real world settings and routine practice, to improve the quality and effectiveness of services. The RGAC identified three components of an effective strategy for AACP to assist schools in applying implementation science in practice and education: 1) raising awareness of implementation science as an opportunity for academic pharmacy, 2) connecting pharmacy researchers with the larger implementation science community, and 3) developing pharmacy researchers in the competencies and methods associated with implementation science. Specific recommendations for this strategy were informed by searches of the literature and funding landscape related to implementation science and pharmacy. The RGAC also identified stakeholder groups that AACP could target in a campaign to raise awareness of implementation science and connectivity to the existing research community in this space, including academic leadership, faculty with expertise in relevant research methodologies (eg, the Social and Administrative Science (SAS) section of AACP), and the academic pharmacy community as a whole.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesEducation, PharmacyPharmacistsPharmacy and Therapeutics CommitteePharmacy ResearchSocieties, PharmaceuticalCareer MobilityCooperative BehaviorCurriculumHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationStaff DevelopmentUnited Statescurricular transformationimplementation sciencepractice transformationprofessional development

Identifiers

PMID33149346
PMCPMC7596610
OpenAlexW3035793667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.