Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33149146›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Metabolite signatures of diverse Camellia sinensis tea populations.

Xiaomin Yu, Jiajing Xiao, Si Chen, Yuan Yu, Jianqiang Ma, Yuzhen Lin, Ruizi Li, Jun Lin, Zhijun Fu, Qiongqiong Zhou and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiaomin Yu *FAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-6795
Jiajing Xiao *Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3888 Chenhua Road, 201602, Shanghai, China.
Si Chen *FAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.
Yuan YuFAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-2377
Jianqiang MaKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China.
Yuzhen LinFAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.
Ruizi LiFAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.
Jun LinFAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.
Zhijun FuFAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China.
Qiongqiong ZhouCollege of Horticulture, Henan Agricultural University, 450000, Zhengzhou, China.
Qianlin ChaoWuyi Star Tea Industry Co., Ltd, 354300, Wuyishan, China.
Liang ChenKey Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 310008, Hangzhou, China. liangchen@tricaas.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-3947
Zhenbiao YangInstitute of Integrative Genome Biology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. yang@ucr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7482-6540
Renyi LiuFAFU-UCR Joint Center for Horticultural Biology and Metabolomics, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China. ryliu@fafu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2534-4171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tea plant (Camellia sinensis) presents an excellent system to study evolution and diversification of the numerous classes, types and variable contents of specialized metabolites. Here, we investigate the relationship among C. sinensis phylogenetic groups and specialized metabolites using transcriptomic and metabolomic data on the fresh leaves collected from 136 representative tea accessions in China. We obtain 925,854 high-quality single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) enabling the refined grouping of the sampled tea accessions into five major clades. Untargeted metabolomic analyses detect 129 and 199 annotated metabolites that are differentially accumulated in different tea groups in positive and negative ionization modes, respectively. Each phylogenetic group contains signature metabolites. In particular, CSA tea accessions are featured with high accumulation of diverse classes of flavonoid compounds, such as flavanols, flavonol mono-/di-glycosides, proanthocyanidin dimers, and phenolic acids. Our results provide insights into the genetic and metabolite diversity and are useful for accelerated tea plant breeding.

Indexed as

MetabolomeCamellia sinensisChinaChromatography, LiquidFlavonoidsFlavonolsGlycosidesMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsPhylogenyPlant LeavesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA-SeqTranscriptomeFlavonoidsFlavonolsGlycosides

Identifiers

PMID33149146
PMCPMC7642434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.