Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148808›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Electric field-driven microfluidics for rapid CRISPR-based diagnostics and its application to detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Ashwin Ramachandran, Diego A Huyke, Eesha Sharma, Malaya K Sahoo, ChunHong Huang, Niaz Banaei, Benjamin A Pinsky, Juan G Santiago

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 304 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microfluidic networks using isotachophoresis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashwin RamachandranDepartment of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-8401
Diego A HuykeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-8335-6613
Eesha SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Malaya K SahooDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
ChunHong HuangDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Niaz BanaeiDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Benjamin A PinskyDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-8751-4810
Juan G SantiagoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; juan.santiago@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8652-5411
Stanford University · USVaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid spread of COVID-19 across the world has revealed major gaps in our ability to respond to new virulent pathogens. Rapid, accurate, and easily configurable molecular diagnostic tests are imperative to prevent global spread of new diseases. CRISPR-based diagnostic approaches are proving to be useful as field-deployable solutions. In one basic form of this assay, the CRISPR-Cas12 enzyme complexes with a synthetic guide RNA (gRNA). This complex becomes activated only when it specifically binds to target DNA and cleaves it. The activated complex thereafter nonspecifically cleaves single-stranded DNA reporter probes labeled with a fluorophore-quencher pair. We discovered that electric field gradients can be used to control and accelerate this CRISPR assay by cofocusing Cas12-gRNA, reporters, and target within a microfluidic chip. We achieve an appropriate electric field gradient using a selective ionic focusing technique known as isotachophoresis (ITP) implemented on a microfluidic chip. Unlike previous CRISPR diagnostic assays, we also use ITP for automated purification of target RNA from raw nasopharyngeal swab samples. We here combine this ITP purification with loop-mediated isothermal amplification and the ITP-enhanced CRISPR assay to achieve detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA (from raw sample to result) in about 35 min for both contrived and clinical nasopharyngeal swab samples. This electric field control enables an alternate modality for a suite of microfluidic CRISPR-based diagnostic assays.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingHumansIsotachophoresisMicrofluidicsNasal MucosaSARS-CoV-2COVID-19CRISPR diagnosticsisotachophoresismicrofluidicsrapid testing

Identifiers

PMID33148808
PMCPMC7703567
OpenAlexW3097419470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.