ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Exposing the distinctive modular behavior of β-strands and α-helices in folded proteins.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure and Functional Characteristics of Soybean Protein from Different Northeast Cultivars and Their Effects on the Quality of Soymilk Gel.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Amyloid β Dodecamer Disrupts the Neuronal Membrane More Strongly than the Mature Fibril: Understanding the Role of Oligomers in Neurotoxicity.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Switching an active site helix in dihydrofolate reductase reveals limits to subdomain modularity.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although folded proteins are commonly depicted as simplistic combinations of β-strands and α-helices, the actual properties and functions of these secondary-structure elements in their native contexts are just partly understood. The principal reason is that the behavior of individual β- and α-elements is obscured by the global folding cooperativity. In this study, we have circumvented this problem by designing frustrated variants of the mixed α/β-protein S6, which allow the structural behavior of individual β-strands and α-helices to be targeted selectively by stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, and solution-state NMR. Essentially, our approach is based on provoking intramolecular "domain swap." The results show that the α- and β-elements have quite different characteristics: The swaps of β-strands proceed via global unfolding, whereas the α-helices are free to swap locally in the native basin. Moreover, the α-helices tend to hybridize and to promote protein association by gliding over to neighboring molecules. This difference in structural behavior follows directly from hydrogen-bonding restrictions and suggests that the protein secondary structure defines not only tertiary geometry, but also maintains control in function and structural evolution. Finally, our alternative approach to protein folding and native-state dynamics presents a generally applicable strategy for in silico design of protein models that are computationally testable in the microsecond-millisecond regime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.