Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148686›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2021

Two-year outcomes after dextrose gel prophylaxis for neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Rebecca Griffith, Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty, Jane M Alsweiler, Greg D Gamble, Robyn May, Christopher Joel Dorman McKinlay, Benjamin Thompson, Trecia Ann Wouldes, Jane E Harding

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neonatal hypoglycaemia.BMJ medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. A quality improvement initiative for neonatal hypoglycemia screening and management in a level III neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca GriffithDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-2212
Joanne Elizabeth HegartyNewborn Services, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jane M AlsweilerDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-6654
Greg D GambleLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Robyn MayLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christopher Joel Dorman McKinlayLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Benjamin ThompsonOptometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Trecia Ann WouldesPsychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jane E HardingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand j.harding@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

"Two year outcomes after dextrose gel prophylaxis for neonatal hypoglycaemia"R01HD091075 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND · PI HARDING, JANE · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of prophylactic dextrose gel for prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia on neurodevelopment and executive function at 2 years' corrected age.

designProspective follow-up of a randomised trial.

settingNew Zealand. PATIENTS: Participants from the pre-hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose (pre-hPOD) trial randomised to one of four dose regimes of buccal 40% dextrose gel or equivolume placebo.

main outcome measuresCoprimary outcomes were neurosensory impairment and executive function. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcomes, neurology, anthropometry and health measures.

resultsWe assessed 360 of 401 eligible children (90%) at 2 years' corrected age. There were no differences between dextrose gel dose groups, single or multiple dose groups, or any dextrose and any placebo groups in the risk of neurosensory impairment or low executive function (any dextrose vs any placebo neurosensory impairment: relative risk (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.19, p=0.23; low executive function: RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.06, p=0.07). There were also no differences between groups in any secondary outcomes. There was no difference between children who did or did not develop neonatal hypoglycaemia in the risk of neurosensory impairment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.64, p=0.81) or low executive function (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.59, p=0.43).

conclusionProphylactic dextrose gel did not alter neurodevelopment or executive function and had no adverse effects to 2 years' corrected age, but this study was underpowered to detect potentially clinically important effects on neurosensory outcomes.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentAdministration, BuccalAftercareAnthropometryDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringFemaleGelsGlucoseHumansHypoglycemiaInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMaleNeurologic ExaminationGelsGlucoseSweetening Agentsneonatologyneurology

Identifiers

PMID33148686
PMCPMC8062278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.