Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148665›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2020

Rheumatologists' perspective on hydroxychloroquine guidelines.

James Winebrake, Leila Khalili, Julia Weiner, Yevgeniya Gartshteyn, Lisa Park, Anca D Askanase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James Winebrake *Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA.
Leila Khalili *Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1070-0997
Julia WeinerRheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Yevgeniya GartshteynRheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-4658
Lisa ParkOphthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Anca D AskanaseRheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA ada20@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-5023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinal toxicity is an ongoing concern for rheumatologists. The revised 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines created controversy regarding the correct dosing and evaluation of HCQ toxicity. The current study was initiated to further understand rheumatologists' practices regarding HCQ.

methodsA questionnaire-based survey was distributed electronically to rheumatologists. We collected information on HCQ dosing, clinical decision-making processes, familiarity with the AAO 2016 guidelines, and perceived disparities between the AAO 2016 guidelines and rheumatological clinical practice.

results78 rheumatologists completed the survey (49% from USA, 90% academic practices, 82% self-identified as lupus experts). Only lupus expert (n=64) data were included in subsequent analysis. The mean cohort size was 747 (50-6571), a total cohort 45 612 patients. HCQ was prescribed to >75% of patients with SLE by 81.3% of SLE experts, with routine counselling about ophthalmic risks. The typical dose of HCQ used was 200-400 mg/day. 17% of rheumatologists use doses up to 600 mg/day, while 6.2% use up to 6.5 mg/kg/day. HCQ adherence is routinely assessed. 479 cases of HCQ retinal toxicity (1.05%) and 9 cases of HCQ-associated blindness (1.8 per 10 000 patients) were reported. 89.1% of respondents reported familiarity with the AAO guidelines. Those aware of the guidelines cited limited dosing options (54.7%), lack of supporting evidence (57.8%) and low patient adherence (43.8%) as obstacles to greater implementation of the guidelines.

conclusionThese data suggest that HCQ toxicity and blindness are rare in patients with SLE. Rheumatologists treating patients with SLE are aware of the guidelines and appreciate the importance of partnering with ophthalmologists in preventing retinal toxicity.

Indexed as

AdultAntirheumatic AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineOphthalmologistsRheumatologistsUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsHydroxychloroquineantirheumatic agentslupus erythematosussystemictherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33148665
PMCPMC7640534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.