Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148648›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

The phase of cortical oscillations determines the perceptual fate of visual cues in naturalistic audiovisual speech.

Raphaël Thézé, Anne-Lise Giraud, Pierre Mégevand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Footstep sounds influence bistable biological motion perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phase-dependent word perception emerges from region-specific sensitivity to the statistics of language.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raphaël ThézéDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-4067
Anne-Lise GiraudDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1261-3555
Pierre MégevandDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland. pierre.megevand@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-547X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we see our interlocutor, our brain seamlessly extracts visual cues from their face and processes them along with the sound of their voice, making speech an intrinsically multimodal signal. Visual cues are especially important in noisy environments, when the auditory signal is less reliable. Neuronal oscillations might be involved in the cortical processing of audiovisual speech by selecting which sensory channel contributes more to perception. To test this, we designed computer-generated naturalistic audiovisual speech stimuli where one mismatched phoneme-viseme pair in a key word of sentences created bistable perception. Neurophysiological recordings (high-density scalp and intracranial electroencephalography) revealed that the precise phase angle of theta-band oscillations in posterior temporal and occipital cortex of the right hemisphere was crucial to select whether the auditory or the visual speech cue drove perception. We demonstrate that the phase of cortical oscillations acts as an instrument for sensory selection in audiovisual speech processing.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationCuesVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID33148648
PMCPMC7673697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.