Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148440›Full record

SynthesisClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2021

Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Francesca Di Toro, Mattheus Gjoka, Giovanni Di Lorenzo, Davide De Santo, Francesco De Seta, Gianpaolo Maso, Francesco Maria Risso, Federico Romano, Uri Wiesenfeld, Roberto Levi-D'Ancona and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 349 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Consequences and implications of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on pregnancy and newborns: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccination or diagnosis among pregnant and non-pregnant women in the United States, 2021-2022.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Do timing and severity of gestational COVID-19 impact perinatal and neonatal outcomes?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca Di ToroInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Mattheus GjokaInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Giovanni Di LorenzoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.dilorenzo@burlo.trieste.it.
Davide De SantoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Francesco De SetaInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Gianpaolo MasoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Francesco Maria RissoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Federico RomanoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Uri WiesenfeldInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Roberto Levi-D'AnconaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Luca RonfaniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Giuseppe RicciInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) have been associated with unfavourable pregnancy outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the human coronavirus family, and since this infection shows a pandemic trend it will involve many pregnant women.

aimsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) on maternal and neonatal outcomes. SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv, Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 8th May 2020. Articles focusing on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 were eligible. Participants were pregnant women with COVID-19. CONTENT: The meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. Bias risk was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42042020184752). Twenty-four articles, including 1100 pregnancies, were selected. The pooled prevalence of pneumonia was 89% (95%CI 70-100), while the prevalence of women admitted to the intensive care unit was 8% (95%CI 1-20). Three stillbirths and five maternal deaths were reported. A pooled prevalence of 85% (95%CI 72-94) was observed for caesarean deliveries. There were three neonatal deaths. The prevalence of COVID-19-related admission to the neonatal intensive care unit was 2% (95%CI 0-6). Nineteen out of 444 neonates were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA at birth. Elevated levels of IgM and IgG Serum antibodies were reported in one case, but negative swab. IMPLICATIONS: Although adverse outcomes such as ICU admission or patient death can occur, the clinical course of COVID-19 in most women is not severe, and the infection does not significantly influence the pregnancy. A high caesarean delivery rate is reported, but there is no clinical evidence supporting this mode of delivery. Indeed, in most cases the disease does not threaten the mother, and vertical transmission has not been clearly demonstrated. Therefore, COVID-19 should not be considered as an indication for elective caesarean section.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLive BirthMaternal MortalityPregnancyPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2StillbirthCaesarean deliveryCoronavirusCOVID-19Meta-analysisPregnancySARS-Cov-2Systematic reviewVertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID33148440
PMCPMC7605748
OpenAlexW3095197773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.