Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148347›Full record

SynthesisPsychological medicine2020

Mental health services for infectious disease outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.

Jing-Li Yue, Wei Yan, Yan-Kun Sun, Kai Yuan, Si-Zhen Su, Ying Han, Arun V Ravindran, Thomas Kosten, Ian Everall, Christopher G Davey and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04949061 (Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Among COVID-19 Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04949061 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Among COVID-19 Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled34ConditionsPsychological Distress, Quality of Life, Depressive Symptoms, AnxietyArmsCulturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CA-CBI), Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETA-U)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Jing-Li YuePeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Wei YanPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Yan-Kun SunPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Kai YuanPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Si-Zhen SuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Ying HanNational Institute on Drug Dependence, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Arun V RavindranDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Thomas KostenDivision of Alcohol and Addiction Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ian EverallInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher G DaveyDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Edward BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Norito KawakamiDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Corrado BarbuiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Graham ThornicroftCentre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Crick LundCentre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Xiao LinPeking-Tsinghua Centre for Life Sciences and PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lin LiuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Le ShiPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Jie ShiNational Institute on Drug Dependence, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Mao-Sheng RanDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yan-Ping BaoNational Institute on Drug Dependence, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-0939
Lin LuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNKing's College London · GBBaylor College of Medicine · USThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

COBALT: Comorbid Affective Disorders, AIDS/HIV, and Long Term HealthR01MH100470 · NIMH · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI FAIRALL, LARA ROSEMARY, PETERSEN, INGE · 2013 to 2018
$2.0M
Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The upsurge in the number of people affected by the COVID-19 is likely to lead to increased rates of emotional trauma and mental illnesses. This article systematically reviewed the available data on the benefits of interventions to reduce adverse mental health sequelae of infectious disease outbreaks, and to offer guidance for mental health service responses to infectious disease pandemic. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, WHO Global Research Database on infectious disease, and the preprint server medRxiv were searched. Of 4278 reports identified, 32 were included in this review. Most articles of psychological interventions were implemented to address the impact of COVID-19 pandemic, followed by Ebola, SARS, and MERS for multiple vulnerable populations. Increasing mental health literacy of the public is vital to prevent the mental health crisis under the COVID-19 pandemic. Group-based cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological first aid, community-based psychosocial arts program, and other culturally adapted interventions were reported as being effective against the mental health impacts of COVID-19, Ebola, and SARS. Culturally-adapted, cost-effective, and accessible strategies integrated into the public health emergency response and established medical systems at the local and national levels are likely to be an effective option to enhance mental health response capacity for the current and for future infectious disease outbreaks. Tele-mental healthcare services were key central components of stepped care for both infectious disease outbreak management and routine support; however, the usefulness and limitations of remote health delivery should also be recognized.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksMental Health ServicesPsychotherapyTelemedicineHumansMental DisordersCOVID-19infectious diseasemental health servicepsychological interventiontele-mental healthcare

Identifiers

PMID33148347
PMCPMC7642960
OpenAlexW3095849069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.