Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148328›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2020

Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers.

Kendra L Rieger, Sarah Gazan, Marlyn Bennett, Mandy Buss, Anna M Chudyk, Lillian Cook, Sherry Copenace, Cindy Garson, Thomas F Hack, Bobbie Hornan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Smudging the barriers away: crafting theInternational journal of circumpolar health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kendra L RiegerSchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada. Kendra.Rieger@twu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-2833
Sarah GazanLakota First Nation; Professional and French Language Services, Manitoba Teachers Society, Winnipeg, Canada.
Marlyn BennettFaculty of Social Work, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Mandy BussMax Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Northern Connections Medical Center, Winnipeg, Canada.
Anna M ChudykDepartment of Family Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Lillian Cook, Sagkeeng First Nation, Canada.
Sherry Copenace, Ojibways of Onigaming First Nation, Canada.
Cindy GarsonInterlake Reserves Tribal Council, Headingley, Canada.
Thomas F HackCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Bobbie Hornan, Pimicikamak First Nation, Canada.
Tara HorrillCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Mabel Horton, Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation, Canada.
Sandra HowardNorthern Health Region, Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada.
Janice LintonNeil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, Bannatyne Campus, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Donna MartinCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kim McPhersonSouthern Chiefs' Organization, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jennifer Moore RattraySouthern Chiefs' Organization, Winnipeg, Canada.
Wanda Phillips-BeckFirst Nation Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, Indigenous Research Chair in Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Rebecca Sinclair, Little Saskatchewan First Nation, Canada.
Annette S H SchultzCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a complicated and exploitative history of research with Indigenous peoples and accompanying calls to meaningfully and respectfully include Indigenous knowledge in healthcare. Storytelling approaches that privilege Indigenous voices can be a useful tool to break the hold that Western worldviews have within the research. Our collaborative team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, and Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare providers, and administrators, will conduct a critical participatory, scoping review to identify and examine how storytelling has been used as a method in Indigenous health research.

methodsGuided by two-eyed seeing, we will use Bassett and McGibbon's adaption of Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. Relevant articles will be identified through a systematic search of the gray literature, core Indigenous health journals, and online databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AgeLine, Academic Search Complete, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Canadian Reference Centre, and PsycINFO. Qualitative and mixed-methods research articles will be included if the researchers involved Indigenous participants or their healthcare professionals living in Turtle Island (i.e., Canada and the USA), Australia, or Aotearoa (New Zealand); use storytelling as a research method; focus on healthcare phenomena; and are written in English. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full-text articles. We will extract data, identify the array of storytelling approaches, and critically examine how storytelling was valued and used. An intensive collaboration will be woven throughout all review stages as academic researchers co-create this work with Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare professionals, and administrators. Participatory strategies will include four relational gatherings throughout the project. Based on our findings, we will co-create a framework to guide the respectful use of storytelling as a method in Indigenous health research involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. DISCUSSION: This work will enable us to elucidate the extent, range, and nature of storytelling within Indigenous health research, to critically reflect on how it has been and could be used, and to develop guidance for the respectful use of this method within research that involves Indigenous peoples and settlers. Our findings will enable the advancement of storytelling methods which meaningfully include Indigenous perspectives, practices, and priorities to benefit the health and wellbeing of Indigenous communities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/rvf7q ).

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesPopulation GroupsAgedAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCanadaDelivery of Health CareHumansScoping Reviews as TopicAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplesAboriginal peoplesAlaska Native peoplesAotearoaAustraliaCanadaDecolonizing researchFirst NationsHealthIndigenous peoplesInuitMaoriMetisNative AmericansNew ZealandQualitativeScoping reviewStoriesStorytellingTurtle IslandTwo-eyed seeingUSA

Identifiers

PMID33148328
PMCPMC7640994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.