Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148287›Full record

ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

Reprogramming the tumour microenvironment by radiotherapy: implications for radiotherapy and immunotherapy combinations.

Madyson Colton, Eleanor J Cheadle, Jamie Honeychurch, Tim M Illidge

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Intratumoral Injection of Clostridium novyi-NT in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madyson ColtonDivision of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eleanor J CheadleDivision of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jamie HoneychurchDivision of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tim M IllidgeDivision of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. tim.illidge@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-7324
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28280Cancer Research UK 28701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) is a highly effective anti-cancer therapy delivered to around 50-60% of patients. It is part of therapy for around 40% of cancer patients who are cured of their disease. Until recently, the focus of this anti-tumour efficacy has been on the direct tumour cytotoxicity and RT-induced DNA damage. Recently, the immunomodulatory effects of RT on the tumour microenvironment have increasingly been recognized. There is now intense interest in potentially using RT to induce an anti-tumour immune response, which has led to rethinking into how the efficacy of RT could be further enhanced. Following the breakthrough of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs), a new era of immuno-oncology (IO) agents has emerged and established immunotherapy as a routine part of cancer treatment. Despite ICI improving outcomes in many cancer types, overall durable responses occur in only a minority of patients. The immunostimulatory effects of RT make combinations with ICI attractive to potentially amplify anti-tumour immunity resulting in increased tumour responses and improved outcomes. In contrast, tumours with profoundly immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments, dominated by myeloid-derived cell populations, remain a greater clinical challenge and RT may potentially further enhance the immunosuppression. To harness the full potential of RT and IO agent combinations, further insights are required to enhance our understanding of the role these immunosuppressive myeloid populations play, how RT influences these populations and how they may be therapeutically manipulated in combination with RT to improve outcomes further. These are exciting times with increasing numbers of IO targets being discovered and IO agents undergoing clinical evaluation. Multidisciplinary research collaborations will be required to establish the optimal parameters for delivering RT (target volume, dose and fractionation) in combination with IO agents, including scheduling to achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune checkpointsImmuno-oncology agentsImmunotherapyRadiation therapyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33148287
PMCPMC7640712
OpenAlexW3095556714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.