Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148255›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Community-based surveys for Plasmodium falciparum pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions in selected regions of mainland Tanzania.

Catherine Bakari, Sophie Jones, Gireesh Subramaniam, Celine I Mandara, Mercy G Chiduo, Susan Rumisha, Frank Chacky, Fabrizio Molteni, Renata Mandike, Sigsbert Mkude and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Local variability inMalariaWorld journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Catherine BakariJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sophie JonesMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gireesh SubramaniamMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Celine I MandaraNational Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre, Tanga, Tanzania.
Mercy G ChiduoNational Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre, Tanga, Tanzania.
Susan RumishaNational Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Frank ChackyNational Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Dodoma, Tanzania.
Fabrizio MolteniNational Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Dodoma, Tanzania.
Renata MandikeNational Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Dodoma, Tanzania.
Sigsbert MkudeNational Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Dodoma, Tanzania.
Ritha NjauWorld Health Organization (WHO) Country Office, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Camelia HermanMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Douglas P NaceMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ally MohamedNational Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), Dodoma, Tanzania.
Venkatachalam UdhayakumarMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Caleb K KibetJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Steven G NyanjomJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eric RogierMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Deus S IshengomaNational Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. deusishe@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-3416
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KENational Institute for Medical Research · TZHarvard University · USKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZ

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are effective and widely used for the detection of wild-type Plasmodium falciparum infections. Although recent studies have reported false negative HRP2 RDT results due to pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions in different countries, there is a paucity of data on the deletions of these genes in Tanzania.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between July and November 2017 in four regions: Geita, Kigoma, Mtwara and Ruvuma. All participants had microscopy and RDT performed in the field and provided a blood sample for laboratory multiplex antigen detection (for Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase, aldolase, and P. falciparum HRP2). Samples showing RDT false negativity or aberrant relationship of HRP2 to pan-Plasmodium antigens were genotyped to detect the presence/absence of pfhrp2/3 genes.

resultsOf all samples screened by the multiplex antigen assay (n = 7543), 2417 (32.0%) were positive for any Plasmodium antigens while 5126 (68.0%) were negative for all antigens. The vast majority of the antigen positive samples contained HRP2 (2411, 99.8%), but 6 (0.2%) had only pLDH and/or aldolase without HRP2. Overall, 13 samples had an atypical relationship between a pan-Plasmodium antigen and HRP2, but were positive by PCR. An additional 16 samples with negative HRP2 RDT results but P. falciparum positive by microscopy were also chosen for pfhrp2/3 genotyping. The summation of false negative RDT results and laboratory antigen results provided 35 total samples with confirmed P. falciparum DNA for pfhrp2/3 genotyping. Of the 35 samples, 4 (11.4%) failed to consistently amplify positive control genes; pfmsp1 and pfmsp2 and were excluded from the analysis. The pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes were successfully amplified in the remaining 31 (88.6%) samples, confirming an absence of deletions in these genes.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that P. falciparum parasites in the study area have no deletions of both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes. Although single gene deletions could have been missed by the multiplex antigen assay, the findings support the continued use of HRP2-based RDTs in Tanzania for routine malaria diagnosis. There is a need for the surveillance to monitor the status of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 deletions in the future.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionAdolescentAdultAntigens, ProtozoanChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMaleMiddle AgedPlasmodium falciparumPrevalenceProtozoan ProteinsAntigens, ProtozoanHRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparumHRP3 protein, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAldolaseHistidine-rich protein 2/3Lactate dehydrogenaseMalariaPlasmodium falciparumRapid diagnostic testsTanzania

Identifiers

PMID33148255
PMCPMC7640459
OpenAlexW3096622877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.