ArticleBMC urology2020
Bladder neck reconstruction in girls' pelvic fracture bladder neck avulsion and urethral rupture.
Article in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of pelvic fracture urethral injury.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGirls' pelvic fracture bladder neck avulsion and urethral rupture is rare however it causes great morbidity. The management is complex and not standard yet. We report our experience and a technique of bladder neck reconstruction with anterior bladder wall flap.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed data of 5 girls with pelvic fracture bladder neck avulsion and urethral rupture admitted to our institution from July 2017 to October 2019. They all came to our institution with a suprapubic tube. Patients' trauma was all initially treated at other hospitals, 4 had suprapubic cystotomy and 1 had urethral realignment. One girl also had three other urethroplasties at other hospitals. We took pubectomy, posterior ureth roplasty and bladder neck reconstruction with anterior bladder wall flap in these 5 girls. Post-operative assessments included voiding cystourethrography, uroflowmetry and urethroscopy after urethral catheter removal. Verbal consent to participate was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of the children.
resultsOperation time ranged from 120 to 180 min. Follow-up time is 12 to 27 months. Uroflowmetry showed that maximum urine flow rate improved significantly. Cystourethrography indicated good continuity of the urethra. Two girls had urinary incontinence postoperatively but were continent 3 months later. One patient developed vesical-abdominal fistula and got repaired by surgery 6 months later. She was continent ever since. Other complications were not observed during the follow-up period.
conclusionsOur method of bladder neck reconstruction using bladder flap as a patch is feasible and provides good continence, especially for those with serious bladder neck avulsion and urethral rupture caused by extensive trauma and those who had posttraumatic urethral distraction needed second repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.