Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148235›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2020

Epinephrine penetrates through gingival sulcus unlike keratinized gingiva and evokes remote vasoconstriction in human.

János Vág, Bernadett Gánti, Barbara Mikecs, Enikő Szabó, Bálint Molnár, Zsolt Lohinai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04131283 (Evidence of Spreading Vasoconstriction in Human Gingiva), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04131283 nacompletednot on this map

Evidence of Spreading Vasoconstriction in Human Gingiva

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled29ConditionsVasoconstriction, Oral Soft Tissue Conditions, Dental and Gingival ConditionsArmsEpinephrine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

János VágDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary. drvagjanos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6183-7598
Bernadett GántiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Barbara MikecsDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Enikő SzabóDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint MolnárDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt LohinaiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

Hungarian Human Resource Development Operational Programme EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006Hungarian Scientific Research Fund K112364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been demonstrated in non-oral tissues that the locally evoked vasoconstriction could elicit remote vasoconstriction. This study aimed to investigate the spreading vasoconstrictor effects of epinephrine in the gingiva.

methodsGingival blood flow (GBF) was measured by laser speckle contrast imager in 21 healthy volunteers. In group A, two wells were fabricated from orthodontic elastic ligature and placed 2 mm apically to the free gingival margin at the mid buccal line of 12 (test side) and 21 (control side) teeth. The GBF was measured in the wells and tightly apical, coronal, distal and mesial to the wells. In group B, the wells were made on the buccal surface of the same teeth, including the gingival sulcus. Four regions were selected for measurement from the gingival margin reaching the mucogingival line (coronal, midway1, midway2 and apical). After the baseline recording, 3 µg epinephrine was applied into the test, and physiological saline into the control well. The GBF was recorded for 14 min. The gingival thickness was measured with a PIROP Ultrasonic Biometer.

resultsIn group A, the GBF did not increase or decrease after the application of epinephrine. In group B, the GBF significantly decreased in all regions of the test side and remained low for the observation period. The vasoconstriction appeared with delays in more apical regions (at min 1 in the coronal and the midway1, at min 2 in the midway2, at min 4 in the apical region). Similarly, the amount of the decrease at 14 min was the largest close to sulcus (- 53 ± 2.9%), followed by the midway1 (- 51 ± 2.8%) and midway2 (- 42 ± 4.2%) and was the lowest in the apical region (- 32 ± 5.8%). No correlation was found between GBF and gingival thickness.

conclusionEpinephrine could evoke intense vasoconstriction propagating to the mucogingival junction, indicating the presence of spreading vasoconstriction in the human gingiva. The attached gingiva is impermeable to epinephrine, unlike the gingival sulcus. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov titled as Evidence of Spreading Vasoconstriction in Human Gingiva with the reference number of NCT04131283 on 16 October 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04131283.

Indexed as

GingivaVasoconstrictionEpinephrineHumansVasoconstrictor AgentsEpinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsBlood flowEpinephrineGingivaSpreading vasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID33148235
PMCPMC7640651
OpenAlexW3094833340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.