Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33148232›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

In-PREP: a new learning design framework and methodology applied to a relational care training intervention for healthcare assistants.

Heather Wharrad, Sophie Sarre, Justine Schneider, Jill Maben, Clare Aldus, Elaine Argyle, Anthony Arthur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Engaging Nursing Assistants to Enhance Receptivity to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Heather WharradSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK. heather.wharrad@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6030-5648
Sophie SarreSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College, London, UK.
Justine SchneiderSchool of Law and Social Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jill MabenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Clare AldusSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Elaine ArgyleSchool of Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Anthony ArthurSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research 12/129/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'Older People's Shoes' is a training intervention designed for healthcare assistants (HCAs) to improve the relational care of older people in hospital. The intervention formed part of a broader evaluation, in this paper we describe its development from a learning design and methodological perspective.

methodsLearning theory and an instructional design model were key components of the In-PREP (Input, Process, Review and Evaluation, Product) development methodology used in the design of the 'Older People's Shoes' training intervention to improve the delivery of relational care by front-line hospital staff. An expert panel, current evidence, and pedagogical theory were used to co-design a training programme tailored to a challenging work environment and taking account of trainees' diverse educational experience. Peer review and process evaluation were built into the development model.

resultsIn-PREP provided a methodological scaffold for producing evidence-based, peer-reviewed, co-designed training. The product, 'Older People's Shoes', involved a one-day Train the Trainers event, followed by delivery of a two-day, face-to-face training programme by the trainers, with accompanying handbooks underpinned by a range of digital resources. Evaluation found the approach met learner needs, was applicable in practice and won approval from trainers. DISCUSSION: In-PREP enables high quality learning content, alignment with learner needs and a product that is relevant, practical and straightforward to implement.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelLearningAgedAged, 80 and overHumansCo-designContinuing professional developmentEducational theoryHealthcare assistantsIntervention developmentOlder peoplePedagogical designRelational careTraining

Identifiers

PMID33148232
PMCPMC7643258
OpenAlexW3096464338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.