ArticleBMC public health2020
Lifestyle-associated health risk indicators across a wide range of occupational groups: a cross-sectional analysis in 72,855 workers.
Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and pulmonary function across occupational groups and educational levels: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the chalkboard: overnutrition and cardiometabolic health among high school teachers in a semi-urban community in Southwestern Nigeria.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors of LUTS associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia among Chinese men: findings from the CHARLS cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Construction of an index system for workplace services by family doctors in China: a two-round Delphi study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Rising trends in body mass index and obesity prevalence among young Thai men: a 16-year analysis of new military conscript data (2009-2024).BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Assessment of the Representation of Civil Servants as the General Population in Terms of Health Checkup Data.Cureus · 2025Article
- A Temporal Validation Study of Diagnostic Prediction Models for the Screening of Elevated Low-Density and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Obesity and Occupational Disparities in Urban China: Evidence from a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The dual impact of education and occupation on cognitive functioning in older Mexican adults: A cross-sectional exploratory study.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- New job, new habits? A multilevel interrupted time series analysis of changes in diet, physical activity and sleep among young adults starting work for the first time.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- Occupational status and health disparities among workers-An empirical study based on China health and nutrition survey data.PloS one · 2025Article
- In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024Article
- Structural and functional cardiac parameters across occupations: a cross-sectional study in differing work environments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revisiting the physical activity paradox: the role of cardiorespiratory fitness in workers with high aerobic demands.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Perceived Factors Influencing Blue-Collar Workers' Participation in Worksite Health Promotion Programs in Freight Transport: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Job-related factors associated with tobacco use among Chinese food delivery riders: A cross-sectional survey.Tobacco induced diseases · 2024Article
- Moderating effect of cardiorespiratory fitness on sickness absence in occupational groups with different physical workloads.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Influence of shift work on periodontitis according to the occupation group.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Association of secondhand smoke exposure and health-related lifestyle behaviors among male university employees in Japan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Determination of the Level of Cardiovascular Risk in 172,282 Spanish Working Women.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentify and compare health risk indicators for common chronic diseases between different occupational groups.
methodsA total of 72,855 participants (41% women) participating in an occupational health service screening in 2014-2019 were included. Occupation was defined by the Swedish Standard Classification of Occupation, and divided into nine major and additionally eight sub-major groups. These were analysed separately, as white- and blue-collar occupations and as low- and high-skilled occupations. Seven health risk indicators were self-reported: exercise, physical work situation, sitting at work and leisure, smoking, diet, and perceived health, whereas cardiorespiratory fitness, BMI and blood pressure were measured. These were further dichotomized (yes/no) and as clustering of risk indicators (≥3 vs. <3).
resultsThe greatest variation in OR across sub-major and major occupational groups were seen for daily smoking (OR = 0.68 to OR = 5.12), physically demanding work (OR = 0.55 to OR = 45.74) and high sitting at work (OR = 0.04 to OR = 1.86). For clustering of health risk indicators, blue-collar workers had significantly higher clustering of health risks (OR: 1.80; 95% CI 1.71-1.90) compared to white-collar workers (reference). Compared to high-skilled white-collar workers, low-skilled white-collar workers had similar OR (2.00; 1.88-2.13) as high-skilled blue-collar workers (1.98; 1.86-2.12), with low-skilled blue-collar workers having the highest clustered risk (2.32; 2.17-2.48).
conclusionThere were large differences in health risk indicators across occupational groups, mainly between high-skilled white-collar occupations and the other occupations, with important variations also between major and sub-major occupational groups. Future health interventions should target the occupational groups identified with the highest risk for effective disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.