Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147935›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2021

Phase I study of selinexor in combination with dexamethasone, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell or natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma

Tiffany Tang, Peter Martin, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Cindy Lim, Miriam Tao, Eileen Poon, Maica Jd Yunon, Shu Q Toh, Sean X Yan, Mohamad Farid and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiffany TangDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore. Tiffany.Tang.P.L@singhealth.com.sg.
Peter MartinDivision of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Nagavalli SomasundaramDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Cindy LimDivision of Clinical Trials and Epidemiology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Miriam TaoDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Eileen PoonDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Maica Jd YunonDivision of Clinical Trials and Epidemiology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Shu Q TohDivision of Clinical Trials and Epidemiology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Sean X YanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital.
Mohamad FaridDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Jason Y ChanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Soon T LimDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGCornell University · USSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selinexor is a selective inhibitor of nuclear export with anti-cancer properties. We performed a phase I study to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of selinexor when combined with high-dose dexamethasone, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (DICE) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) T-cell lymphoma (TCL) and natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL). Patients with R/R TCL and NKTL were treated with standard dose ICE, dexamethasone 20mg on days 3 to 7, and escalating doses of oral selinexor on days 3, 5 and 7 in a 3+3 design. Dose level (DL) 1, 2 and 3 were 40, 60 and 80mg respectively. Eleven patients with a median age of 60 were enrolled; 6 at DL1 and 5 at DL2. Patients had received a median of 2 (range 1-4) prior lines of treatment and 7 had primary refractory disease at study entry. Patients received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-6) of selinexor-DICE. The most common grade (G) 1/2 toxicities included nausea (64%), fatigue (55%), and anorexia (45%) and the most common G 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (82%), anemia (82%), neutropenia (73%), and hyponatremia (73%). Two patients developed doselimiting toxicities at DL2 and one at DL1. Five patients discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression or lack of response. Of the 10 evaluable patients, the overall and complete response rates were 91% and 82% respectively. The MTD of selinexor was 40mg when combined with DICE. The combination showed promising CR rates in patients with R/R TCL and NKTL but was poorly tolerated.

Indexed as

IfosfamideLymphoma, T-CellAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDexamethasoneEtoposideHumansHydrazinesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTriazolesCarboplatinDexamethasoneEtoposideHydrazinesIfosfamideselinexorTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID33147935
PMCPMC8634181
OpenAlexW3095960313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.