Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147903›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2021

Gallstone pancreatitis: general clinical approach and the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Shanker Kundumadam, Evan L Fogel, Mark Andrew Gromski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acute edematous pancreatitis caused byRadiology case reports · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The possible role of viral infections in acute pancreatitis: a review of literature.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shanker KundumadamDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Evan L FogelDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mark Andrew GromskiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallstones account for majority of acute pancreatitis in the Western world. Increase in number and smaller size of the stones increases the risk for biliary pancreatitis. In addition to features of acute pancreatitis, these patients also have cholestatic clinical picture. Fluid therapy and enteral nutrition are vital components in management of any case of acute pancreatitis. During initial evaluation, a right upper quadrant ultrasonogram is particularly important. On a case-bycase basis, further advanced imaging studies such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound may be warranted. Acute management also involves monitoring for local and systemic complications. Patients are triaged based on predictors of ongoing biliary obstruction in order to identify who would need endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Index cholecystectomy is safe and recommended, with exception of cases with significant local and systemic complications where delayed cholecystectomy may be safer.

Indexed as

GallstonesPancreatitisAcute DiseaseCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomyHumansCholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrogradeCholecystectomyPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID33147903
PMCPMC7820643
OpenAlexW3096143642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.