Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147864›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Work Potential and Work Performance during the First Try-Out of the Person-Centred Return to Work Rehabilitation Programme ReWork-Stroke: A Case Study.

Annika Öst Nilsson, Ulla Johansson, Elin Ekbladh, Birgitta Bernspång, Therese Hellman, Gunilla Eriksson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annika Öst NilssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Huddinge, Sweden.
Ulla JohanssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Huddinge, Sweden.
Elin EkbladhDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9365-7033
Birgitta BernspångDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Therese HellmanDepartment of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-220X
Gunilla ErikssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-4821
Uppsala University · SELinköping University · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

Centre for Research & Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg n/aDoctoral School for Health Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet n/aNorrbacka-Eugeniastiftelsen -STROKE-Riksförbundet -The regional agreement on medical training and clinical research between Uppsala University and University Hospital (ALF) n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis case study explores changes in work potential and work performance for ten people who worked before their stroke while participating in the ReWork-Stroke programme. It describes measures performed by the occupational therapists to enhance work potential and work performance and the participants' level of work re-entry nine months after the start of their work trial.

methodsTen people who had experienced a mild or moderate stroke participated. Changes were assessed using the Worker Role Interview and the Assessment of Work Performance. Logbooks relating to work potential and work performance were analysed using content analysis.

resultsThe participants' work potential was in general supportive to returning to work at baseline and remained so at the three-month follow-up. Most changes occurred in the environmental factors regarding the participants' belief that adaptations at the workplace would make re-entry possible. Changes concerning work performance were predominately in a positive direction. Seven of the participants returned to paid work.

conclusionThe ReWork-Stroke programme seems promising for promoting changes in work potential, work performance, and return to paid work. However, further studies are needed to evaluate changes in work potential and work performance and the programme's effectiveness for increasing work re-entry for people who have had stroke.

Indexed as

occupational therapyrehabilitationstrokevocationalwork

Identifiers

PMID33147864
PMCPMC7711447
OpenAlexW3096828654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.