Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147862›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Costing of Cesarean Sections in a Government and a Non-Governmental Hospital in Cambodia-A Prerequisite for Efficient and Fair Comprehensive Obstetric Care.

Eva Glaeser, Bart Jacobs, Bernd Appelt, Elias Engelking, Ir Por, Kunthea Yem, Steffen Flessa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva GlaeserDepartment of General Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Bart JacobsSocial Health Protection Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GiZ), Phnom Penh 12302, Cambodia.
Bernd AppeltSocial Health Protection Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GiZ), Phnom Penh 12302, Cambodia.
Elias EngelkingSocial Health Protection Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GiZ), Phnom Penh 12302, Cambodia.
Ir PorNational Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Phnom Penh 12150, Cambodia.
Kunthea YemNational Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Phnom Penh 12150, Cambodia.
Steffen FlessaDepartment of General Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4068-1539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowing the cost of health care services is a prerequisite for evidence-based management and decision making. However, only limited costing data is available in many low- and middle-income countries. With a substantially increasing number of facility-based births in Cambodia, costing data for efficient and fair resource allocation is required. This paper evaluates the costs for cesarean section (CS) at a public and a Non-Governmental (NGO) hospital in Cambodia in the year 2018. We performed a full and a marginal cost analysis, i.e., we developed a cost function and calculated the respective unit costs from the provider's perspective. We distinguished fixed, step-fixed, and variable costs and followed an activity-based costing approach. The processes were determined by personal observation of CS-patients and all procedures; the resource consumption was calculated based on the existing accounting documentation, observations, and time-studies. Afterwards, we did a comparative analysis between the two hospitals and performed a sensitivity analysis, i.e., parameters were changed to cater for uncertainty. The public hospital performed 54 monthly CS with an average length of stay (ALOS) of 7.4 days, compared to 18 monthly CS with an ALOS of 3.4 days at the NGO hospital. Staff members at the NGO hospital invest more time per patient. The cost per CS at the current patient numbers is US$470.03 at the public and US$683.23 at the NGO hospital. However, the unit cost at the NGO hospital would be less than at the public hospital if the patient numbers were the same. The study provides detailed costing data to inform decisionmakers and can be seen as a steppingstone for further costing exercises.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionHealth Care CostsHospitals, PublicCambodiaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGovernmentHumansPregnancyAsiaCambodiacesarean sectioncostingmaternal health care

Identifiers

PMID33147862
PMCPMC7663741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.